SOME 'NEGATIVE' PRESS FOR BARAK OBAMA TODAY...
The aide reportedly telling Canadian officials that Obama’s NAFTA talk is more “political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.” (USA Today) John Fund looks at how the media is ignoring Obama’s troubled past. (WSJ) Another story begins “Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday said damaging stories swirling around her rival show that the true vetting of Sen. Barack Obama has just begun, and she predicted that a strong finish today in Ohio and Texas will revive her run for the Democratic presidential nomination.” (Washington Times) The Senator from Illinois is also under fire from a fellow member of the United Church of Christ for alleged lies about a speech he gave to the church. (American Spectator) Obama hopes to finish Hillary off today. (FOX News) But final polls in Ohio are breaking for Hillary. (Realclearpolitics) And she’s retaken the lead in Texas. (Realclearpolitics) From Rick Santorum on Obama’s battle against the Born Alive Infants Protection Act: “He effectively voted for infanticide. He voted to allow doctors to deny medically appropriate treatment or, worse yet, actively kill a completely delivered living baby. Infanticide - I wonder if he'll add this to the list of changes in his next victory speech and if the crowd will roar: "Yes, we can." (Philadelphia Inquirer)
OBAMA IMPLIES SERMON ON THE MOUNT SUPPORTS CIVIL UNIONS...
Telling a crowd in Ohio “If people find that controversial, then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans.” (Baptist Press) In the past, he’s made it clear he will be an advocate for gay causes, in Ohio he is stating that he is "not" supportive of Same-Sex Marriage, but he will support Same-Sex Unions and the benefits that go with such a union. (Baptist Press) He's consistent on homosexuality, but he has me confused with his reference to "The Sermon on the Mount". What was he trying to say? Also here at Conservative News
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT TO HEAR ARGUMENTS ON GAY MARRIAGE...
With a ruling expected in 90 days from the Court, get ready folks. The story compared it to “the 1948 decision, cited repeatedly in the voluminous filings before the court, that struck down California's ban on interracial marriage.” Remember, interracial marriage still included a 'man and a woman', what the court is deciding is not 'just' created race but also created sexuality. This is a redefining of the institution called marriage and it will have HUGE impact upon our country, culture and children. San Francisco Chronicle
