E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS








There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
HOME

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Even at 500, Calvin isn't Slowing Down

Even at 500, Calvin isn't Slowing Down

Daniel Burke

Religion News Service


Like most 24-year-old men, Stephen Jones is keenly interested in sin. But while many of his peers enjoy their youthful indiscretions, Jones takes a more, shall we say, Puritanical stand.

Last weekend (June 12-15), Jones and 4,000 other young Christians packed into a convention center in Palm Springs, Calif., to hear preachers tell them that they are totally depraved, incapable of doing the right thing without a mighty hand from God, and -- most importantly -- have absolutely no control over their eternal fate.

The mind behind that message is John Calvin, the 16th-century Reformer often better known for condemning sinners and heretics than for igniting evangelical zeal. But as Presbyterian and other Reformed churches prepare for the 500th birthday of their spiritual godfather on July 10, increasingly, it is young American evangelicals who are taking up his theological torch.

"His theology is the hottest, most explosive thing being discussed right now," said Justin Taylor, 32, a self-described Calvinist, and an editorial director at Crossway, a Christian publisher in the evangelical heartland of Wheaton, Ill. "What he taught is extraordinarily influential right now."

Young evangelicals are scooping up books by neo-Calvinist authors, packing churches and conventions led by Calvinist preachers and studying at staunchly Calvinist seminaries. They're blogging their way through Calvin's behemoth "Institutes of the Christian Religion," setting up Facebook fan clubs and opening Twitter feeds.

Many proudly bare their fidelity to Calvinism's "five points" of predestination as if they were stars on a general's chest. Earlier this year, Time magazine served notice that "The New Calvinism" is one of "10 ideas that are changing the world right now."

In other words, Calvinism has moved out of the Puritan meetinghouse and into the megachurch.

Though he is often portrayed as a dour, prickly Puritan, Calvin was a sensitive pastor with a thankless task, said Karin Maag, a professor of history at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Mich.

"He had the complicated and painstaking job of creating a new church," Maag said. "It's easy to get people together on what they don't like, but to make the Reformation take hold in people's lives and people's hearts was rather more difficult."

So, while Martin Luther fired up the masses, Calvin, essentially, gave them new rules. Maag said the people of Geneva were not exactly appreciative: they named their dogs after Calvin and sang rude songs outside his window. As a Protestant leader in a Catholic territory, Calvin lived under the constant threat of siege, Maag said.

American neo-Calvinists say they are similarly besieged by the forces of secularism. And while the ministers and churches of their youth kept them entertained, they didn't offer the kind of intellectual firepower many find in Calvinism.

"Most of them grew up in some kind of church but they were not taught much doctrinal formation; they played youth-group games," said Collin Hansen, author of the 2008 book "Young, Restless, Reformed: A Journalist's Journey with the New Calvinists." "When they went to college, the games didn't seem worth it."

Calvinism, Hansen and others say, provides a time-tested doctrinal anchor to keep young evangelicals from being swept away by the mainstream. Some of the largest neo-Calvinist churches -- Mars Hill Church in Seattle, Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York, and Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington -- stand in the country's most secular cities.

"Calvin's is a sovereign God who answers all questions," Jones said, "by causing us to lose ourselves and truly deny ourselves."

But Calvin can also be a profoundly divisive figure. The Calvinist belief that Jesus died only for an elect few and that humans can do nothing to earn their eternal reward has split Christians for centuries, said Peter J. Thuesen, a professor and author of a forthcoming book called "Predestination: The American Career of a Contentious Doctrine."

"That idea has upset so many different religious groups, the backlash against it gave rise to some of the denominational diversity in the United States," as churches split from each other over predestination debates, said Thuesen.

In fact, Baptists are still fighting over Calvin. About 30 percent of young Southern Baptists consider themselves Calvinists, according to a survey by the denomination's research arm.

Pastor Tom Ascol, executive director of the pro-Calvin Founders Ministries, said that's a good thing.

"I think it's undeniable that the rising generation of evangelicals, not just in the Southern Baptist Convention but all over, are awakening to a fresh vision of God's sovereign majesty over every square inch of earth."

But former Southern Baptist Convention President Jerry Vines said Calvinism inhibits evangelism and missionary work, which is the lifeblood of the SBC, the nation's largest Protestant denomination. If Jesus died only for the elect, then what's the point of trying to reach others, said Vines, who co-organized a conference dedicated to debunking Calvinism last year.

"I do believe it is possible to be a five-point Calvinist and be evangelistic and missionary-minded," Vines said. "But their evangelism and missionary work is in spite of their Calvinism, and not because of it. That's going to make some of them mad, but I do believe it."

c. 2009 Religion News Service

Original publication date: June 19, 2009

Related Links
Most Recent User Comments
chillie
6/29/2009 8:18 PM
The argument of Predestination or foreknowledge as set forth by Augustine, Luther and Calvin, being that God foreknew those who would be saved and Christ’s death was not to secure sanctification for all but only for a chosen few or the elect. That those chosen would be convicted by the Holy Spirit to repentance and be saved, also that from the point of being saved a person could not lose their salvation no matter what sin’s they may commit, that God through the Holy Spirit would before their death bring them back from a reprobate state to one of grace ensuring their salvation. While others seeking redemption would only be forced to play the role with no hope of salvation and be lost with the rest of the world. Would this really represent the true nature of God? Or does it serve the social or theological elite to promote their agenda.
The biggest difference between man, angels and animal’s is that man and angels can exercise free will. God gave Adam and Eve freedom of choice. Joshua set before the people the option to choose life or death. The point being, if salvation is based solely on Gods predetermined election of a few then what advantage is Christianity. To say that a few will be saved by Gods grace and the rest will be damned to hell through no choice of their own makes no sense when held up against most of Paul’s writings. To assume the position of once saved always saved because God loves me more than you is an insult to the life and death of our Lord. Did He (Christ) not die so that all could (indicating free will) come to repentance? Did he not die for the sins of the world?
I would suggest that Calvin spent to much time in a dark damp room more than he spent in the light of Christ. In reviewing his writings concerning arguments against other Christians he did not agree with, and how he referred to them, one has to wonder if he was saved, but I’m sure he thought himself of the Chosen Few.

waltersingingr
6/20/2009 11:39 PM
With all due respect, Jerry Vines has taken the same position that his arminian friends have adopted: you cannot be truly evangelical and believe in predestination. It is a gross misrepresentation of the doctrine. Scripture clearly teaches that God calls His elect through the Gospel message which is the power of God unto salvation. We preach to all because we do not know who the elect are. We preach to all because God has commanded it. It is His plan on how to bring the elect in.

I don't understand why believers must have their doctrine fall into categories which only make sense to them instead of reading all of Scripture and praising God that He will do what He has said He will do. What is wrong with there being an elect body? A proper understanding of the Fall reveals that we are dead from birth (Ephesians). God would be perfectly just in saving none or saving all or saving some. We are all born deserving death, there is none righteous, no not one(Romans).
chosenscribe
6/19/2009 7:58 PM
I have read "The Institutes" and Calvin does not stop us from being just as zealous for evangelism as anyone. The fact that we don't know who is chosen should spur us on. You may be talking to the next chosen one. I don't accept the accusation that predestination takes our zeal away for evangelism. After all Calvin is just reading his Bible. Read Ephesians 1 and Romans 8 and 9 and I think if you are honest you will see it clearly. Just because you don't like it doesn't change God's Word. Paul was VERY evangelistic and he was the one who penned these letters directed by God Himself.
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!