In the face of no evidence to support his outrageous claim, Kerry says that President Bush has stopped looking for Osama bin Laden. It may be impossible for John Kerry to walk and chew gum at the same time, but President Bush is quite capable of carrying on the war against terror on two separate fronts.
Meanwhile John Kerry announces that if he is elected, he will quit in Iraq and go home. If you were an Iraqi insurgent hearing that, would you stop the suicide bombings, the beheadings, and the attacks on coalition soldiers and fellow Iraqi's, or would you step up the pressure in hopes of weakening America's resolve?
And to top it all off Teresa Heinz Kerry, with a cynicism surpassing that of the junior Senator from New York, suggests that the capture of Osama bin Laden may be orchestrated in an attempt to defeat her husband.
"I wouldn't be surprised if he appeared in the next month," she told a group of Arizona Democrats last week.
Coming from a supporter of former president Bill Clinton, that statement should surprise no one. As early as 1996, Sudan offered to give bin Laden to the United States, and the Clinton White House said, "There simply was not the evidence to prosecute Osama bin Laden. He could not be indicted, so it would serve no purpose for him to have been brought into U.S. custody." At the same time, the U.S. State Department was calling bin Laden "the greatest single financier of terrorist projects in the world."
Now Heinz Kerry has the temerity to suggest that the capture of Osama bin Laden would be a bad thing, politically motivated to defeat her husband.
Oh, did I mention that President George W. Bush is responsible for the crash of the Hindenburg, the Chicago fire, the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression, the Lindbergh kidnapping, and the blizzard of 1888 and 1996?
=====
© 2004 Agape Press.
