Declare Your Faith - Sign the "I Am a Christian" Pledge
E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
HOME

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Despite a Few Distractions, "Narnia" Wows

Despite a Few Distractions, "Narnia" Wows...Continued from page 1

Stephen McGarvey

Executive Editor, Crosswalk.com and Christianity.com

One of “Narnia’s” great strengths is the completely believable actors cast as the four Pevensie children. According to Adamson, it took 18 months to find exactly the right kids to portray the movie’s leads. Likewise, Swinton shines as the icy queen Jadis, who holds Narnia in both the literal and figurative grip of winter. At first kind and sweet to the troubled Edmund, the witch wins the allegiance of the wayward sibling turning him against his brother and sisters. He soon learns the true horrible nature of the “Queen” however when he fails to follow her instructions to the letter.

In a theme as enduring as literature itself, Edmund’s treachery, and then repentance remain at the core of the story. His redemption by Aslan the Lion, the true ruler of Narnia and the narrative’s “Christ-figure,” is perhaps the most intense and effective part of the film. Even though these themes are toned down a bit from the book, they are clearly present. Unfortunately the choice of Liam Neeson to voice the Great Aslan was a bit problematic, and often distracting from the story. For all his great talent, Neeson didn’t sound like Aslan to me. Although the movie includes the famous line that Aslan “isn’t a tame lion,” Neeson’s voice did not portray any of the formidable wildness you would have expected to hear in the great lion-king.

To attempt to make a movie of one of the most cherished books of the last 100 years is not without its pitfalls. And there are certainly many minor annoyances along the way in “Narnia,” the more intense fans of the book will notice. For me, "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe," was not merely a beloved book of my youth, it was practically the first book I picked up and read that I didn’t have to. It in many ways started me on the way to a lifelong love of reading and literature. Like many other deep fans of Lewis and the "Chronicles," I had some hard and fast convictions on how this story should be portrayed.

It disappointed me that some of the conversations between the children and the mysterious professor who owned the house with the wardrobe, were greatly abbreviated. I can understand that some of this type of material has to make way for the quicker pace of a movie, yet it is in these moments of the book where the great mind of C.S. Lewis shines through. Adding to this concern is Jim Broadbent’s rather goofy portrayal of the professor.  Those who see this character in the book as a bit of a Lewis cameo will be frustrated.

Technically the movie suffers a bit from some editing problems early on. After the children arrive at the mansion, but before they all discover Narnia, the film drags a bit. Later in the film it felt like key elements went by a little too fast. The visuals and computer generated characters however are stunning. It is one thing to create computer animated mythical beasts for which the viewer has no true frame of reference (and there are plenty of them in this movie), it is quite another to make realistic looking animals. Yet the talking beavers and wolves and even the great lion himself, were completely lifelike. The climactic final battle was convincing even though 99 percent of the participants were CG characters. It lacked the problematic “video game” feeling that so many CG-heavy movies have.

All in all, this film version of “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe” will be considered a success, and it should be. Although it doesn’t meet the standard of an “epic” film, it is certainly enjoyable to watch and largely true to original story. Hats off to the film’s producers at Walden Media who have shown a movie with Christian themes can reach a high standard of technical and narrative excellence.

AUDIENCE:  Generally family, children under 10 may be frightened in a few places. Some of the more intense scenes push the PG rating.

CAUTIONS:

  • Language/Profanity: There is a good deal of bickering among the children, much more than in the book.
  • Drugs/Alcohol:  None
  • Sex/Nudity:  None
  • Violence: One restrained character is hit violently in the head. Children in peril throughout most of the movie: Edmund is chased down and threatened by a dwarf with a knife; the children are chased by wolves; two of the children are brutally injured in the battle sequence and although battle violence is somewhat intense for small children, it is completely bloodless. “Stone Table” sequence is particularly intense, with ritualistic elements that will disturb some.

 

 

Previous | 1 | 2 | All
Most Recent User Comments
Be the first to comment on this article!
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!