E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
Blogs Sponsorship

About Paul Dean

Dr. Paul J. Dean is the pastor of Providence Baptist Church in Greer, SC, and hosts a daily, live, call-in radio talk show: "Calling for Truth." He serves as the Director of Applied Ministry at the Greenville, SC extension of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is also a Regional Mentor with the International Association of Biblical Counselors. Paul speaks at several conferences throughout the year and provides training for ministers and churches on a regular basis. He is married and has three children.

Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
<< >>

Paul Dean

Pastor, Counselor, Professor, Columnist and Radio Talk Show Host

Monday, May 26, 2008

Open the Door to Conversational Evangelism


Doing evangelism is a very different dynamic in today’s culture than it was twenty-five years ago. Then, if you were to ask someone on the street if they believed in God, most would say they did. Further, they would know who you were talking about: the God of the Bible. They would have some understanding and even agreement concerning issues of right and wrong; heaven and hell; the reality of life after death; and the judgment.

Things are very different today. As we have moved into a postmodern culture, we have moved into a post-Christian culture. If you put the same question to the average person on the street today, many would say they don’t believe in God. Those who do believe in God would be apt to have a very different view of God than the True and Living God. There would be wide-spread disagreement concerning morality, life after death, and accountability to God. What can we do?

First, learn to think philosophically.

To put it another way, learn to think in terms of worldview. One of the basic dynamics that attends any worldview that is contrary to the Christian worldview is a lack of philosophical justification for it. This dynamic holds true even in the realm of simply knowing something to be true. In other words, the unbeliever has no basis for knowing anything.

When an unbeliever makes a statement concerning God, the world, man, morality, ethics, or any other subject, he asserts it as an absolute certainty. For example, an atheist who believes in evolution may say that God does not exist. However, on his worldview, he has no basis to make such a statement. On his worldview, knowledge is obtained through observation (or the scientific method). His problem is that he has limited knowledge and ability to obtain that knowledge. He does not have the ability to search every square inch of the cosmos to determine whether or not there is a God. On his worldview, he cannot know that there is no God. His statement of certainty is rendered completely uncertain.

At the same time, he may then say that we can’t know or that we don’t know whether or not there is a God. He is agnostic at that point. However, he has asserted a certainty in his mind, namely, that we don’t know whether or not there is a God. Again, on his worldview, he is rendered uncertain in that he does not know whether or not there is some kind of knowledge somewhere that can tell us whether or not there is a God. He has not investigated the entirety of the universe on this point. He has no philosophical or logical basis to make such a statement.

Of course, Christians have a basis or a philosophical justification for their assertion that there is a God. On our worldview, we know there is a God because He has revealed Himself to us. We are not bound to the limits of empiricism/observation. We know that some knowledge is revealed.

At the same time, we can affirm that we don’t know everything, nor, must we. We have an explanation as to why we don’t know everything. In addition to the fact that God’s general revelation takes time to investigate, God has not revealed everything to us: “The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law (Deut. 29:29).”

Second, learn to think intentionally.

To the subject of evangelism in this culture: we must pray for courage. Here I am asserting that we must pray for a certain kind of courage: a courage that most of us don’t have for any number of cultural reasons. We must pray for courage to ask a simple question of those with whom we dialogue: why? In other words, when we hear someone make a statement that is contrary to the Scriptures, we can, and indeed must, if we are to open doors for witness, ask the simple question, “Why do you believe that?” When it comes to questions concerning God, morality, ethics, religion, origins, and the like, the answer will have no basis on a non-Christian worldview.

Here are some sample questions: why do you believe spanking is wrong? Why do you believe homosexuality is not sin? Why do you think there are many paths to salvation? Why do you believe embryonic stem-cell research is a good thing? Why do you say there is no absolute truth? Why do you think pre-marital sex is okay in certain circumstances? Why do you believe in evolution? How do you know the sun will come up in the morning?

Any number of questions will do. The unbeliever will have no philosophical justification to believe or know anything. He will attempt to justify his answer or knowledge apart from God, something he cannot do logically. Without God’s perspective, one’s view of spanking is relative. Without a commitment to God’s truth, one’s opinion concerning multiple paths to salvation is arbitrary. Without a biblical worldview, one cannot know for certain the sun will come up in the morning. On an evolutionary worldview, it may not. Random chance is foundational.

It is at that point that we can point out that the Christian worldview is the only worldview that makes sense of our experience or knowledge in any one of these areas. God is the one who tells us what to believe about spanking, homosexuality, how to be saved, embryonic stem-cell research, truth, pre-marital sex, our origin, and the laws of nature in effect until Christ comes. As we engage in worldview dialogue, we then segue into the gospel and call for repentance of sinful thinking and a commitment to Christ even in the area of knowledge. “In Christ are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge (Col. 2:3).”

Third, learn to think practically.

Thinking practically on one’s feet may be the most vital skill one can develop. If someone says he doesn’t believe in absolutes, simply ask him if it would be okay for you to take a key and run it down the side of his car? He will no doubt say “no” and therefore express a belief in absolutes as far as he is concerned. Learn to press a person’s statements to their logical conclusions. Learn to demonstrate the flaws in a person’s statements with practical illustrations, particularly ones that affect him. Be gentle and winsome, but press forward.

Because God has placed us in a relativistic world, we must spend some time learning to think philosophically. A few simple tenets will take us a long way. Of course, we will need courage to gently engage others. Asking the simple question “why” is a natural way to advance a conversation. We will have to come up with creative ways to make people see their inconsistencies. We must then pray that God will be pleased to open their hearts to Him as we point them to Christ as their only hope.

Sign up free for “The Dean’s List,” a weekly news and Christian worldview e-letter highlighting relevant news stories affecting Christians. An editorial by Dr. Dean is included as well as his comments on the highlighted stories. The e-letter is sponsored by "Calling for Truth," a daily, live, call-in radio program co-hosted by Dr. Dean and Kevin Boling. Simply e-mail us at pauldeanjr@juno.com to receive your first issue this week.

To listen live to "Calling for Truth" each day from 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm Eastern Time, go to www.callingfortruth.org and click on the "Listen Online" button. You may listen to archived shows as well. They are uploaded each day after the broadcast.

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Most Recent User Comments
kwandongbrian
6/2/2008 8:08 AM
"Christians have a basis or a philosophical justification for their assertion that there is a God. On our worldview, we know there is a God because He has revealed Himself to us."

A problem with this point. Members of other religions also feel strongly about the truth of their faith - I will not say equally strongly as there is no way to tell. Still, as an atheist, I see no reason to to put your justification above that of a Hindu's or a Muslim's.

I want to be careful with this comparison. I approve of feeling there are things worth dying for but not worth killing for. For this reason, I feel better about the motivation of Christian Martyrs than Muslim suicide bombers but both very clearly have great faith in their religion.

Again, I am not explicitly comparing the religions, just saying that, as an atheist, hearing one group or another claim a "philosophical justification" has equal ( or no) value to me.

Using this claim in a debate is not likely to impress an atheist.
hukkster
6/2/2008 5:17 AM
It's great to hear motivation and some know how in evangelism. In my experience non Christians are quite happy to live with inherent contradictions. They won't necessarily turn from their convictions because we point out their internal and fatal flaws. If anything, they'll politely nod and avoid you like the plague next time. But if we couple this with the love of Christ, His powerful selfless love in practical ways, then we have a dynamic and powerful and hard to refuse form of evangelism. For all the philosophical views and intelligentsia of mankind, each person still yearns to be loved!

It's also great to hear the call for us to start inviting non Christians to actually make a decision, to repent and to believe. What a difference this will make to any evangelism attempt.

Great article. Keep up the good work.
evey
5/31/2008 10:55 AM
I reread your post and realize that you were referring to homosexual people that you know, perhaps my post will speak to their situation. Forgive me for not reading it clearly the first time. Thanks.