With their large portion sizes and high grease loads, restaurant meals are generally less nutritious than their home-cooked counterparts. But how bad are they, particularly for young people?
When they ate at fast-food restaurants, kids up to age 11 ate an extra 125 calories over the course of a day, while adolescents age 12 and older ate about 310 excess calories, the researchers report today in the journal Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. Even when they ate at full-service restaurants, kids added 160 calories to their daily consumption while teens added about 270.
In the older group, eating at fast-food restaurants led teens to consume 13 percent more sugar, 22 percent more total fat, 25 percent more total fat and 17 percent more sodium.
Kids who ate out more drank more sodas and other sugar-sweetened drinks. And the difference in calories and fat consumed was greatest for kids from lower-income and minority families.
The findings should add weight to public policies that reduce the amount of food kids eat from restaurants and fast-food joints, the authors say. Those might include zoning rules that restrict restaurants near schools, or regulations that reduce portion sizes or limit food marketing to kids.
Source: Discovery News
Have something to say about this article? Leave your comment via Facebook below!
Recently by Jim Liebelt
- Americans Who Remain Single at an Historic HighTuesday, September 30, 2014
- Teen Perceptions of Sexual Activity More Influential Than Peer PressureMonday, September 29, 2014
- What's Hot? 09/26/14Friday, September 26, 2014
- The Younger the Age of First Drink, the Higher the Odds for Problem Drinking LaterThursday, September 25, 2014
- Girls Do Better Than Boys in All School SubjectsWednesday, September 24, 2014
Recently on Crosswalk Blogs
Add Crosswalk.com content to your siteBrowse available content