Crosswalk.com aims to offer the most compelling biblically-based content to Christians on their walk with Jesus. Crosswalk.com is your online destination for all areas of Christian Living – faith, family, fun, and community. Each category is further divided into areas important to you and your Christian faith including Bible study, daily devotions, marriage, parenting, movie reviews, music, news, and more.

Religion Today Blog Christian Blog and Commentary

Church Property Must be Forfeited after Court Rules against Conservative South Carolina Diocese

  • Veronica Neffinger
    Religious persecution, missions, Christianity around the world
  • 2017 Aug 03
  • Comments

The South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that South Carolina churches which broke off from the Episcopal Church are not entitled to keep church property formerly belonging to them when they were a part of the Episcopal denomination.

According to Christianity Today, the more conservative diocese split from the denomination due to difference of opinion on homosexuality, as well as other scriptural issues.

Since the diocese split from the denomination five years ago, it has been involved in an ongoing dispute over its right to maintain Episcopal Church land holdings, name, and leadership.

A previous court ruling stated that the diocese could maintain its property, but its claims to the church name, symbols, leadership, etc. were challenged by the Episcopal Church, although the diocese was ultimately allowed to maintain ownership of these intellectual claims. However, the recent Supreme Court ruling has said essentially the opposite.

In a 3-2 vote, the Court stated that the Episcopal Church could maintain the rights to their property. The court also handed down a 2-2 decision on the diocese’s intellectual claims, meaning that the earlier ruling by the lower court would be upheld.

This ruling comes despite the fact that the diocese was established prior to the Episcopal Church in the region.

The Diocese of South Carolina’s lead counsel, Alan Runyan, condemned the ruling, calling it “inconsistent with South Carolina and long-standing United States Supreme Court precedent involving church property disputes.”

 

Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Publication date: August 3, 2017