E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
MOVIES Sponsorship

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Product photo

No Cinematic Treasure Found in Fool's Gold

Christa Banister

Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer

DVD Release Date:  June 17, 2008
Theatrical Release Date:  February 8, 2008
Rating:  PG-13 (for action violence, some sexual material, nudity, language)
Genre:  Comedy
Run Time:  113 min.
Director:  Andy Tennant
Actors:  Matthew McConaughey, Kate Hudson, Donald Sutherland, Alexis Dziena, Kevin Hart

It’s been said that “lightning never strikes twice in the same place,” and the adage definitely applies to Matthew McConaughey and Kate Hudson in Fool’s Gold.

While the actors’ easy chemistry and comedic charms made a rather formulaic premise surprisingly entertaining in 2003’s How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, any hope of striking rom-com gold twice was quickly washed away by a hokey script and hardly a laugh in the Fool's Gold’s nearly two-hour running time.

Incidentally, for anyone who’s wondered if Hudson and McConaughey are indeed this decade’s Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks as many movie mags have recently suggested, well forget it. Although the easy-on-the-eyes pair gives it their best effort, they just don’t look like they’re having that much fun here.

Perhaps that’s because the treasure-solving initiative they’re supposed to be all excited about really isn’t that interesting. Sure, there may be diamonds, rubies and emeralds “the size of your fist” at large, but the history behind the treasure is told to such detailed (and boring) effect, that it’s hard to believe these sun-kissed creatures ever cared in the first place.

So in the absence of a well-crafted (or at least semi-entertaining) story, the filmmakers attempt to trick the audience by putting a whole lot of bronzed skin on parade. And while it’s clear that Hudson and McConaughey especially have done their due diligence at the gym, that’s hardly enough to even consider Fool’s Gold a guilty pleasure.

Unlike, say, National Treasure where the history lesson is light and breezy, McConaughey’s Ben “Finn” Finnegan and his now- ex-wife Tess (Hudson) are obsessed with some booty that’s far more obscure—the legendary Queen’s Dowry, a ship full of Spanish treasure that supposedly sunk in the Caribbean in the early 1700s.

Since the treasure’s apparently worth a rather large fortune, although how much is never really clarified, Finn just can’t forget about it. And when Finn’s repeated failed attempts to capture it put him in hot water with a rapper named Bigg Bunny (Kevin Hart), Finn hopes that trying to find the dowry one more time will not only help him pay off his debts, but will repair his crumbled marriage to the woman he still loves.

Not surprisingly, given Tess’ ranting about Finn’s lack of funds, he doesn’t have any financing for his adventure. Well, until a billionaire yacht owner, Nigel Honeycutt (Donald Sutherland) and his ditzy celeb daughter (an annoying Alexis Dziena) conveniently enter the picture. Given the fact that he’s already rich, Nigel’s interest in the treasure isn’t all that clear. But with a curious British accent that comes and goes as quickly as the waves, Nigel helps anyway, adding nothing new to this already overblown affair.

So does Finn achieve his goals and find the dowry? My guess is that you probably won’t care by film’s end. If the writers had actually bothered to give the characters some depth, then you might. But that lack of character development, not to mention a harebrained story that’s really not worth telling in the first place, wouldn’t allow even the best onscreen duo to shine. Now that’s foolish indeed.

CAUTIONS:

  • Drugs/Alcohol:  Social drinking shown throughout.
  • Language/Profanity:  Plenty of your standard-issue profanity, including instances of the Lord’s name taken in vain.
  • Sex/Nudity:  There’s a long running joke that Tess married Finn for the sex, and his bedroom prowess is discussed several times. Later on, the newly divorced couple has sex in a church. While there’s plenty of noise, nothing is shown except kissing. Two of the chefs on the ships are gay lovers and aren’t particularly shy about making sexual innuendos. Finn’s bare bottom is briefly shown in one scene, and a woman purposely flashes her breasts at Finn when he’s in search of rescue in another scene. Many of the characters also wear skimpy clothing (tiny bikinis for all the girls and McConaughey is shirtless per usual).
  • Violence:  There’s plenty of gunfire (including one character getting wounded), people hitting each other with any random (and heavy) object available and violence played for comedic effect.
  • Religion:  After Finn and Tess have sex in the church, Tess is worried that she and Finn are going to be struck by lightning.
     
Most Recent User Comments
rnjonker
6/23/2008 1:30 PM
Keeping it short and to the point. What God or "god" do you serve. To use the phrase "Oh my god.." can be any god but "Jesus" is the son of the living God and is God. In this movie His name is used explicitely and invain. Do the math. Do not compromise.

Very offensive
tmbrown
6/18/2008 4:55 PM
I agree with the last person that commented. This is a christian website. Their sole purpose in reviewing movies is so that we can be aware of content in a movie before we actually see it. As an adult, you have the right to determine for yourself if the questionable content they list is enough to stop you from seeing a movie or not. Before I started reading christian movie reviews, it was really difficult to find good movies. You never knew if a movie had really offensive elements that they had kept hidden in the movie trailer. As far as the reviewer not thinking this movie was funny, is a matter of opinion. But you get that from any movie reviewer. You either find a reviewer you usually agree with or if it's something you want to see, you see it and judge for yourself. It is uncalled for to berate the movie critics on this site for doing nothing more than providing a much needed service. If you don't like their reviews-don't read them.
j.is.blessed
6/17/2008 11:49 PM
Please correct me if I am wrong, but this is a Christian website. The critics are writing their reviews based on bibical principle. Some of the things mentioned, such as brief nudity, language and so on are caution for us. God clearly speaks about these things in the bible. It is true that what you may watch is not condeming for you, but for someone else it may be, this is why they write their reviews. I know I feel more condemed about sexual content in a movie. If you don't like what the critic has to say, then don't come to this site. The critic has a duty to show us what is not bibically correct about a movie. To those that come here looking for a review only to shoot down the critic, maybe you should go to Yahoo movies and read their reviews. I personally and glad to hear what they think of the movie. Remember, you are coming to a Christian website, not a secular one. Please, be respectful.
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!