<i>Watchmen</i> Puts the "Graphic" in Graphic-Novel Adaptation

Watchmen Puts the "Graphic" in Graphic-Novel Adaptation

Christian Hamaker

Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer

DVD Release Date:  July 21, 2009
Theatrical Release Date:  March 6, 2009
Rating:  R (for strong graphic violence, sexuality, nudity and language)
Genre:  Action
Run Time:  163 min.
Director:  Zack Snyder
Cast:  Billy Crudup, Patrick Wilson, Malin Akerman, Jackie Earle Haley, Matthew Goode, Carla Gugino, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Stephen McHattie, Edward Blake, Robert Wisden

EDITOR’S NOTE:  The following review contains discussion of adult subject matter that is not appropriate for young readers.  Parents, please exercise caution.

Comic-book heroes aren’t what they used to be. The Batman films have grown darker and more nihilistic. The X-Men are serious examinations of what it means to be societal outcasts. The trend is toward serious themes—very serious—and away from the fun action-adventure stories that many of us grew up with.

Watchmen is one of the most disturbing adaptations yet. Dark and violent, it one-ups last year’s blockbuster, The Dark Knight, in explicit imagery, and it cannot be recommended. However, the story has potent themes that will resonate with Christian viewers and which demand discussion.

Based on a highly touted graphic novel by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, Watchmen takes place in an alternate, late twentieth-century America. The year is 1985. Richard Nixon (Robert Wisden) is president. The United States has won the Vietnam War, but the Cold War continues and tensions are on the rise.

The Watchmen—a group of outlawed crime fighters—reconstitute after one of their number, the Comedian (Edward Blake), ends up dead. Is there a campaign to rid the world of Watchmen?

Only one of these masked crusaders has superhuman abilities. Dr. Manhattan (Billy Crudup) was once a physicist named Jon Osterman, but after dying in a lab accident, he was reconstituted as a nearly omniscient being with blue skin—and often no underwear. (Yes, another cultural taboo—male frontal nudity—has fallen. The male member has made fleeting appearances in movies like Eastern Promises from 2007, but this year such appearances bridge the lower-grossing art-house fare, such as The Reader, with assumed blockbusters like Watchmen.)

The other Watchmen are damaged people who have channeled life’s disappointments and abuses into something that they believe benefits their fellow man. Yet vestiges of those earlier disappointments linger. Laurie Juspeczyk, also known as Silk Spectre II (Malin Akerman), finds fulfillment in the arms of other Watchmen—first Dr. Manhattan, then Dan Dreiberg (Patrick Wilson), also known as Nite Owl II. Laurie leaves Dr. Manhattan when, during a lovemaking session, she discovers that he’s not giving her his undivided attention; burdened with the ability to see into the future (although he’s not omniscient, by his own admission), he’s preoccupied by a nuclear conflict that appears to be imminent.

1 | 2 | Next | All

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Most Recent User Comments
ConsiderTruth
4/29/2009 1:26 PM
Continued response to rjagator78...

The fact that there are pyramids at the end of this movie may have less to do with that unfinished pyramid (on the back of the money in your wallet) and more to do with the Egyptian culture from which Ozymandius takes his "character".

Now, I hated this movie. I thought it was terrible and should have been shut down just based on the graphic nudity. We as Christians should be the light of the world, and by letting this movie go unscathed, I believe we failed.

Please, before speaking false statements of freemasonry, do some research somewhere besides the internet. I am not being hateful in this response, though it may sound that way... I just want all readers to know that there is no masonic imagery in this film. None at all...
ConsiderTruth
4/29/2009 1:20 PM
I would like to respond to posts by rjagator78, and comment on the film.

I know it's been out a while, but I just saw it. I was disgusted by it from front to end. It's overly violent, sexually explicit, and terribly dark in nature. I wouldn't recommend the film to anyone.

Religious overtones? I don't see much. It's a superhero movie. As a kid I remember my parents talking about the religious overtones of Superman! Really??

However, I do want to speak to statements about freemasonry and the symbols in the movie of that fraternity. I will start by saying I am a Christian... and a mason. Please understand, that nothing you said, rjagator78, is true. Masonry doesn't have anything to do with the illuminati... though it's a cool thing to talk about. Masonry doesn't believe in a yet to be fulfilled prophecy of a returning Messiah. In fact, masonry does not teach any religious beliefs. Please continue...
brandonswaney28
3/30/2009 7:52 PM
I love Super Hero movies, and i would most likely like the characters in this one. I, however, dont like the adult content. A super hero movie can still be good without the adult content.
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!

E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors