Sign up to post your comments
It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below.
You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community
and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of
sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com,
Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!
Required fields marked with *
But as one of the women who gets labeled as 'intimidating', I find her explanation inadequate.
I am not a radical feminist and never have been. But I am a professional young woman who deals with men and women in challenging environments all the time.
Professionally, I'm called "sweet," "competent," and even "unpresupposing." True, I take strong stands and sometimes people don't like me for that. But in church environments I've been called "intimidating." If McCulley's explanation is the only one, why the difference? Why are some men intimidated but not others? If most Christian guys are so easily intimidated and want weak women, should I really pretend to be less than I am so they can feel more macho by comparison?