Why Did Nikki Haley Resign as UN Ambassador?
- Jim Denison Denison Forum on Truth and Culture
- 2018 10 Oct
The big news this morning is Nikki Haley’s decision to resign as US Ambassador to the United Nations. She reportedly suggested the idea to President Trump six months ago and plans to make her resignation effective at the end of the year.
Why is she leaving a position of such influence?
“It’s been eight years of intense time”
The president was effusive in his praise: “She’s done a fantastic job and we’ve done a fantastic job together. We’ve solved a lot of problems and we’re in the process of solving a lot of problems.”
However, skeptics immediately began speculating about the “real reasons” for Ambassador Haley’s decision. While some have pointed to the possibility that she might run for president in 2020, she stated clearly: “I can promise you what I’ll be doing is campaigning for this one [pointing to President Trump].”
Others are suggesting that her role has become limited since John Bolton took over as national security adviser. Critics have questioned her use of private airplanes last year. And some wonder if financial considerations were a factor since she has one child in college and another headed there soon.
Ambassador Haley’s explanation is simple: “It’s been eight years of intense time,” referring to her tenure as governor of South Carolina prior to joining the administration. She wants the president to have “the strongest person to fight” and believes “it’s good to rotate in other people who can put that same energy and power into it.”
It’s worth noting that her two-year tenure is exactly the average for a UN ambassador: Since the position was created in 1946, there have been thirty-six people to hold the office.
Hurricane Michael and political storms
In other news, Hurricane Michael is expected to make landfall over the Florida Panhandle later today. Forecasters predict “a dangerous storm surge, flooding rainfall and damaging winds.” Total damage and economic impact in the US could approach $15 billion.
In this day of heightened political tensions, we should not be surprised that the approaching storm is sparking political storms as well. Florida Gov. Rick Scott, who is running for the US Senate, may see his favorability ratings rise as he responds to the natural disaster. Skeptics are already claiming that his hands-on response to the pending tragedy is politically motivated.
In addition, the Democratic nominee for governor pulled his TV spots from media markets set to be impacted by the storm, while his Republican opponent did not. Now both sides are accusing the other of using the storm for political purposes.
“Absolute power corrupts absolutely”
Why are we so quick to ascribe political motives to political leaders? One reason is that we’re so often right when we do.
Lord Acton, a prominent British historian, famously remarked: “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority. . . . There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.”
Time will tell if Ambassador Haley has other reasons for resigning her post. I sincerely hope that, as a professing Christian, her actions mirror her explanations. And I sincerely hope that mine do as well.
Paul could testify: “We behaved in the world with simplicity and godly sincerity, not by earthly wisdom but by the grace of God” (2 Corinthians 1:12). Peter cautioned us to “put away all malice and all deceit and hypocrisy and envy and all slander” (1 Peter 2:1).
One of the primary reasons for Billy Graham’s remarkable effectiveness was his personal integrity and sincerity. When I think of Christians whose lives have most influenced mine, their character comes first to mind.
Abraham Lincoln’s crisis of character
The jaded nature of our culture has a silver lining: the more skeptical our society, the more persuasive our commitment to integrity.
Presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin’s latest book, Leadership: In Turbulent Times, is a captivating look into the private lives of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Lyndon Johnson. She opens a fascinating window into the way in which attacks on Lincoln’s personal integrity came to shape his character and future.
When Lincoln served the Illinois state legislature, a deep economic recession prevented him from keeping promises he’d made to rebuild state infrastructure. His reputation was left in tatters. He also broke off his engagement with Mary Todd, causing her deep embarrassment and inciting much social animosity toward him.
Lincoln fell into a deep depression. But rather than wallow in despondency, he resolved to rebuild his reputation. He redoubled his efforts to become an excellent lawyer and rekindled his relationship with Mary Todd, leading to their marriage. He began campaigning effectively for other candidates and perfected a speaking style that helped immortalize him as president.
A day that changes everything
One way God redeems the skepticism of our day is by using it to distinguish those who choose to live with integrity. But it’s not enough for us to act with character–what we do must match who we are.
And we cannot change who we are unless we remember Whose we are.
The psalmist could “give thanks to the Lord with my whole heart,” not just his public worship (Psalm 111:1). Paul was “crucified with Christ” so that “it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me” (Galatians 2:20).
Before we can live with character, we must live for Christ. We will manifest the nature of Jesus to the degree that we are yielded to the lordship of Jesus.
Watchman Nee: “A day must come in our lives, as definite as the day of our conversion, when we give up all right to ourselves and submit to the absolute Lordship of Jesus Christ.”
Is today that day for you?
For more from the Denison Forum, please visit www.denisonforum.org.
The Daily Article Podcast is Here!
Publication Date: October 10, 2018
Photo Courtesy: Getty Images/Mark Wilson/Staff