After having seen There Will Be Blood three times in packed theatres, there is no question it deserved its seven Oscar nominations—and perhaps should have received the Academy Award for best picture on Sunday night (No Country for Old Men triumphed, while Daniel Day-Lewis of Blood received the best actor award). But many evangelical Christians might disagree.
Based on Upton Sinclair’s novel Oil!, There Will Be Blood chronicles the degeneration of the fictional 19th century oil man Daniel Plainview who (as my own 15-year-old son has accurately described) becomes “less and less human and more and more reclusive” as his story unfolds. Because the movie vividly depicts the violence, lust and greed which accompany Plainview’s descent, many Christians see in it no socially or spiritually redeeming value. I disagree.
Consider The Passion of the Christ. It exceeded all expectations at the box office and since it did, evangelical Christians have come to expect “socially redeeming” films to overtly, explicitly and clearly spell out the Christian gospel almost “verse by verse.”
While not offering a clear presentation of the gospel, the need for the gospel is present in There Will Be Blood more in the form of a photographic negative than as a detailed Technicolor print. Christians prefer their gospel discussions pretty and bright, not dark and foreboding. Furthermore, many evangelical Christians object to There Will Be Blood because they believe it displays needless violence.
However, There Will Be Blood contains less dark elements than does the gospel story itself. Salvation was, after all, secured for us through what can properly be characterized as a miscarriage of justice leading to the torturous, bloody and shameful public execution of the Son of God. The all-too-often sterile Sunday School version of events surrounding the death of Christ does not accurately reflect just how violent it was. If the trial and crucifixion of Jesus Christ were accurately depicted on the big screen today, it would probably earn an NC-17 rating and Christians would boycott the film for not reflecting “Christian” morality. Ironic indeed.
But the whole point of There Will Be Blood is violence; therefore the violence cannot be characterized as "needless." Nihilistic, perhaps, but not needless.
Jesus said, “An evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart brings forth evil things” (Matthew 12:35). A critical element of the gospel (which is left out of many contemporary presentations) is the reality of the evil that abides within us, and the damning effect it produces through our words and deeds. This film exposes the evil heart of Daniel Plainview (and, and by extension, of every human being) as he recklessly pursues the satisfaction of his passions. Some people are psychologically abused in this pursuit, others are physically abused and some even die. Even family ties are no match for the unrestrained depravity that overtakes this man by the end of the film, resulting in his being abandoned by everyone, including his own conscience, which is the ultimate end of sin. Daniel Plainview’s closing line in the film is nothing more than a paraphrase of James 1:15: “Sin, when it is finished, brings forth death.”
"The absence of this gospel is the reason for the violence. In the end the film cries out for a resolution that only the gospel of Jesus Christ can offer. By leaving out an explicit presentation of the gospel the screenplay inadvertently, if not intentionally leaves the need for the gospel in PLAIN VIEW."
The exact same thing could be said of any piece of pornographic filmography out there! You have NO grasp of your own lack of insight into the purpose of God if you think that this film was worthy of even one Academy Award! It was NOT that this film had NO Positive Christian characters, or NO Positive storyline or even absolutely NO point in having told this wretched story in the first place; it is this films TOTAL LACK OF MEANING, devoid of any purpose, that left me scratching my head saying: What the h*** did I just watch, and why did I just subject myself to it? Do you honestly think, that the makers of this film were TRYING to put the Gospel in PLAIN VIEW?!