McCain chooses Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for V.P.
E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
PARENTING

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Recently On Parenting
Product photo

Protecting Our Girls: Chastity and the Truth about the HPV Vaccine

Penna Dexter

Baptist Press

DALLAS (BP)--Texas Governor Rick Perry issued an executive order this month requiring girls entering the sixth grade in Texas public schools to receive Gardasil, Merck & Co.’s new vaccine against certain strains of the Human Papilloma Virus that cause 70 percent of the cases of cervical cancer.

The mandate, which takes effect for the school year beginning in 2008, has created a firestorm of conservative protest citing parental rights concerns. Kelly Shackelford, president of the Texas-based Free Market Foundation, a policy arm of Focus on the Family, told the Dallas Morning News, “I haven’t seen this kind of explosion in the grassroots for a number of years.”

This may or may not be a done deal in Texas. Twenty-six of 31 Texas state senators signed a letter asking the governor to withdraw the order. One of the signors is the author of a bill requiring the vaccine who sees this as a matter for the legislature, not gubernatorial edict. My guess is that Gov. Perry, a Republican, took this action because he doubted Texas lawmakers would enact a requirement for the vaccine. The legislature has created, in recent years, a climate friendly to parental rights, emphasizing abstinence education. But the governor remains unmoved by the protests.

Merck is spending millions to promote HPV vaccine mandates in every state, working in part through an activist organization called Women in Government, made up of female state legislators. The specter of cervical cancer is a powerful motivator for these requirements, and 18 states are currently considering them. But it’s important to add some perspective, since this will be debated in statehouses across the country:

1. The benefit from this vaccine accrues to those women and girls who choose to be sexually active. HPV is not airborne; it is transmitted sexually.

2. According to the National Cancer Institute, more than 90 percent of HPV cases are harmless and go away without treatment. Although a worldwide problem, with annual PAP testing, cervical cancer and related deaths are decreasing in the United States. The most frequent result of HPV is genital warts, a treatable condition.

3. We do not know the long-term side effects of the vaccine. The testing period lasted four years and included only women in the 16 to 26 age group. During that period the National Vaccine Information Center recorded adverse reactions of severe headaches, dizziness, temporary loss of vision and lost consciousness. For sexually active women, this vaccine is a wise risk. It’s a bad idea for 12-year-old virgins.

4. The length of effectiveness of the vaccine is not yet known. Estimates are 3.5 to 5 years. This could leave 15 year olds, inoculated at age 11, with a false sense of security.

5. Although Gardasil protects against four common strains of HPV, there are 26 others and hundreds of additional sexually transmitted diseases. This mandate is like a band-aid that is too small to heal the results of immoral behavior.

6. Parents may opt their daughters out of this requirement. However, the current exemption process in Texas has been described as a “bureaucratic nightmare” which must be repeated every two years.

7. We're already laying a "toxic load" of vaccines on our kids. How many more behavior-related vaccines will be developed and mandated? The government is not equipped to make these medical decisions for individual children. It makes sense for this vaccine to be offered, free of charge, to the uninsured who want it. But this should be on an “opt-in,” not an “opt-out” basis.

Speaking to the press, Republican state Sen. Jane Nelson wondered why the Gardasil mandate does not apply to boys. Men are carriers of HPV, and to wipe out a disease, you go after the carriers. But it’s girls who stand to lose the most from the sexually promiscuous culture we have created. Unfortunately, a virgin until marriage could contract HPV and other diseases from a spouse with a promiscuous past, so premarital testing and counseling regarding all sexually transmitted diseases should be considered.

But parents, not the government, should make the call. Protecting our girls is a complicated process. These controversial medical fixes become necessary when we throw out moral constraints. We need to tell our daughters we expect them to save sex for marriage. Protecting our girls involves some tough choices and honest conversations that need to begin early.

(c) 2007 Baptist Press. Used with permission. All rights reserved.

Penna Dexter is a board of trustee member with the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, a conservative activist and an announcer on the syndicated radio program "Life on the Line" (information available at www.lifeontheline.com). She currently serves as a consultant for KMA Direct Communications in Plano, Texas, and as a co-host of "Jerry Johnson Live," a production of Criswell Communications. She formerly was a co-host of Marlin Maddoux's "Point of View" syndicated radio program.

Most Recent User Comments
theflubes
2/24/2007 6:02 PM
My 15 year old, (almost 16) daughter just received this shot. She said to the nurse and doctor that she is a virgin and didn't need the shot because she wasn't planning any activity. They explained to her that it wouldn't hurt her to have the vaccine, but could lead to cirvical cancer if she changed her mind and got the HPV virus. I think the most conservative and pure young lady should still get this shot because there are so many things that can happen. I've seen very pure girls decide to have relations because they were "in love". In addition we cannot prevent an attack on our girls. I say air on the side of caution.
jquatman
2/24/2007 9:48 AM
There is no cure for cervical cancer but now there IS protection from it. What is the issue?
jquatman
2/24/2007 9:44 AM
This vaccine has not been approved for males at this time, but as soon as it is . . . it will be stongly encouraged that all children receive this vaccine against cervical cancer.I understand the concerns about giving the child a false sense of security and that is the last thing any of us desire. I am a medical professional and I strongly enourage any girl of age to receive the vaccine. However, while I am explaining it I make sure I make it very clear that it is to prevent CERVICAL CANCER NOT STDs. I look at the girl and tell her that she can still contract an STD and even still get HPV, but that if she does get it, that she will be protected from the cervical cancer associated with it. I also encourage them to stay safe by not having sex at all, that abstinence is the ONLY safe sex there is.
If the information is given correctly and the media stops speaking of it in terms of an STD vaccine, the truth may be understood.
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!