Daniel Darling Christian Blog and Commentary

God Doesn't Care How It Plays in Peoria

  • Daniel Darling
    Daniel Darling is the Vice President for Communications for the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention (ERLC). For five years, Dan served as Senior Pastor of Gages Lake Bible Church in the northwest suburbs of Chicago and is the author of several books, including Teen People of the Bible, Crash Course, iFaith, Real, and his latest, Activist Faith. He is a weekly contributor to Out of Ur, the blog of Leadership Journal. His work has been featured in evangelical publications such as Relevant Magazine, Homelife, Focus on the Family, Marriage Partnership, In Touch with Dr. Charles Stanley. He has guest-posted on leading blogs such as Michael Hyatt, The Gospel Coalition, OnFaith (Washington Post), and others. He is a contributing writer for many publications including Stand Firm, Enrichment Journal and others. Dan’s op-eds have appeared in Washington Posts’ On Faith, CNN.com's Belief Blog, and other newspapers and opinion sites. He is a featured blogger for Crosswalk.com, Churchleaders.com and Believe.com, Covenant Eyes, G92, and others. Publisher's Weekly called his writing style "substantive and punchy." Dan is a sought-after speaker and has been interviewed on TV and radio outlets across the country, including CNN, 100 Huntley Street, Moody Broadcasting Network, Harvest Television, The Sandy Rios Show, American Family Radio, the Salem Radio Network, and a host of other local and national Christian media. He holds a bachelor’s degree in pastoral ministry from Dayspring Bible College and is pursuing a Masters of Divinity degree from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He and his wife Angela have four children and reside in the Nashville area. Daniel is represented by Tamela Hancock Murray of The Steve Laube Literary Agency
  • 2011 Nov 14
  • Comments

I've been watching some of the news reports regarding the accusations made against Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain. I have no idea if the charges against him or true. Only God, Herman Cain, and the accusers do. When the first accuser came out I thought perhaps it might be a political dirty trick, an opposing campaign or a media campaign against a conservative candidate. But now that there has been five women who have stepped forward, it's a bit hard for me to believe that this is some coordinated attack. Perhaps there's a pattern here.

What's most distressing to me is the way that Mr. Cain, a man I admired and was actually considering voting for, has handled this whole situation. He's shown no remorse. He's blamed other candidates. Then he's blamed the media. Now, to be fair, I think he has a right to defend himself and his honor, especially if the charges are not true. But Cain has swung wildly and has not appeared contrite or professional.

Furthermore, Mr. Cain has used his campaign to dig up dirt on the accusers and then spread that to the media. This is dirty politics. Smear the accuser and muddy the waters. It's what Bill Clinton did when facing his own charges. I think this is reprehensible for a man who not only calls himself a lifelong follower of Christ, but is an ordained minister. Smearing the other person, even if the charges against Cain are false, is the lowest form of politics.

But perhaps the most distressing part of this whole sordid affair is how I've heard conservatives, many Christians, discuss this about Cain. Some have defended him and have blamed it on the "lamestream media" as if any negative reports against a conservative candidate are automatically an attack. Or they've given the whole "if this was a Democrat ..." defense. This is lame. We all know that if a liberal had these problems, the conservative media would have no problem rushing to judgement against him or her.

Others have written off Mr. Cain. They say they are glad this was exposed in the primary because if it came out in the general election, it would sink the candidate and give President Obama a win. The discussion has all centered around "How will this play among women?" and "How will this play in a Republican primary in Iowa?" Those are valid discussions, but I hear no one saying: "Maybe what Mr. Cain did was wrong. Maybe he's not a man of character. Maybe this should disqualify him from being president." There is such an impulse to protect our own. Partisanship is so blind.

As followers of Christ, our first concern should not be "How will this play in Peoria?" but "Is this right and good and does it please God?" Christians are supposed to be the people of character, right? Haven't we hammered liberals for not having character?

I think there is a lesson here not simply about politics, but life. We live in a world seemingly run by PR and spin. So many of our decisions are based on "What will people think?" or "How does it poll?" or "How will this play?" There is some merit to knowing where people are so you can effectively lead. But our first impulse should be do what is good and right, not what will win affections.

Follow Crosswalk.com