Unavoidable Tension

The digital revolution, and the cultural concerns that go with it, undoubtedly presents the church with a profound tension. On the one hand, digital technology promises the gospel and the church greater reach than at any other time in human history.

On the other hand, there are understandable reasons, and in some cases serious concerns, to hesitate to use it.

Is there a medium that is so much a message that using it distorts the gospel beyond recognition? Does a medium like television reduce any and all content to a mere image absent of any true content? Should the church engage or resist the media torrent? Does the dark side of being online warrant a Luddite mindset in the church?

These questions should keep us from thoughtlessly embracing technology. As Felicia Wu Song writes in Restless Devices, “We have clearly moved into a new cultural moment where many of us feel a twinge of regret about the impoverishing effects of our digital engagement on our lives.”

She’s not alone in feeling this way. According to the Washington Post: “Only 10% say Facebook has a positive impact on society, while 56% say it has a negative impact and 33% say its impact is neither positive nor negative. Even among those who use Facebook daily, more than three times as many say the social network has a negative rather than a positive impact.” Yet in the same Washington Post article, full-time mom Mary Veselka says, “We go into it knowing that we can’t really trust them, but I don’t think we can get around not using it.”

The church must not only live with this tension but also embrace it. The digital revolution has already taken place and has changed the way the world communicates and relates. To refuse to thoughtfully and prayerfully engage our digital world despite its dark side would be theologically misguided and missiologically ruinous.

In The Shallows, Nicholas Carr wondered whether “Google may yet turn out to be a flash in the pan.” No one has that kind of naivete today.

But what of those who would contend that the church must not embrace digital forms of communication because, as Marshall McLuhan argued, the medium is the message, and the mediums we use might run counter to what we hope to achieve? As Song writes, by using some mediums, the church “runs the risk of either naively promoting or remaining dangerously silent about digital habits that are slowly but surely distorting the very understanding and experience of soul formation and genuine Christian discipleship.”

Such sentiments are frequently voiced, but they often come across as just sentiments—attitudes or opinions based on personal preference. As I’ve often told my graduate students, we must be very careful not to build theological fences around personal tastes. And I sense there are many who simply do not like it when a church embraces the digital world. They don’t want to read a book on Kindle, they don’t want to attend a class online, they don’t want to gather in virtual community, they don’t like the feel of an online campus, and from such sentiments, they go into preacher or prosecutor mode.

But even if there is validity to some Christians’ concerns, the reality of our moment is that digital mediums are a primary way our world communicates and relates.

And we must use the digital tools at our disposal even if for no other reason than to call people away from the digital and into the physical so they can experience the full measure of spiritual formation and communal life.

There can be little doubt that, as Jay Y. Kim has written, in a digital age we will still need an “analog church”—real people, real places, and real things. The digital revolution does not mean we have stopped being humans with real needs. But the reality is that the only way to continue the human interaction and transformation the church uniquely provides is to bridge the digital divide.

It will take the digital to both maintain and, in areas where it is desperately needed…

… call people to the physical.

James Emery White

Sources

Excerpt from James Emery White, Hybrid Church: Rethinking the Church for a Post-Christian Digital Age (Zondervan), order from Amazon.

Felicia Wu Song, Restless Devices.

Heather Kelly and Emily Guskin, “Americans Widely Distrust Facebook, TikTok and Instagram with Their Data, Poll Finds,” The Washington Post, December 22, 2021, read online.

Nicholas Carr, The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains.

Jay Y. Kim, Analog Church.

About the Author

James Emery White is the founding and senior pastor of Mecklenburg Community Church in Charlotte, NC, and a former professor of theology and culture at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, where he also served as their fourth president. His latest book, Hybrid Church: Rethinking the Church for a Post-Christian Digital Age, is now available on Amazon or from your favorite bookseller. To enjoy a free subscription to the Church & Culture blog, visit churchandculture.org where you can view past blogs in our archive, read the latest church and culture news from around the world, and listen to the Church & Culture Podcast. Follow Dr. White on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram at @JamesEmeryWhite.

The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of CrosswalkHeadlines.

James Emery White is the founding and senior pastor of Mecklenburg Community Church in Charlotte, NC, and a former professor of theology and culture at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, where he also served as their fourth president. His latest book, Hybrid Church: Rethinking the Church for a Post-Christian Digital Age, is now available on Amazon or from your favorite bookseller. To enjoy a free subscription to the Church & Culture blog, visit churchandculture.org where you can view past blogs in our archive, read the latest church and culture news from around the world, and listen to the Church & Culture Podcast. Follow Dr. White on X, Facebook and Instagram at @JamesEmeryWhite.