AVERAGE USER RATING
Recently On Home
Featured Sponsors
Powerful "Dark Knight" a Solid Superhero Film
Christian Hamaker
Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer
Release Date: July 18, 2008
Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of violence and some menace)
Genre: Action, Crime, Sequel
Run Time: 152 min.
Director: Chris Nolan
Actors: Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Aaron Eckhart, Gary Oldman, Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman
“Some men can’t be bullied or negotiated with,” Alfred the butler (Michael Caine) says to Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) in the summer’s most anticipated movie, The Dark Knight. “Some men just want to watch the world burn.”
It’s a troubling truth—one of many expressed in this newest film in the Batman franchise, which shows the impact such men have on Gotham City and the limited power of those who want to change things for the better.
For fans of the Batman franchise, this sequel to Batman Begins (which restarted the franchise in 2005) turns out to have been worth the wait. Grim and morally complex, The Dark Knight not only explores the dark side of human nature but draws potent parallels with the current war on terrorism, leaving viewers to wrestle with questions of how to respond to injustice.
Bruce Wayne wants to rid Gotham City of mob influence, but the mob has problems of its own. Not only is prosecutor Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) working hard to bring them down, but a villain named the Joker (Heath Ledger) has infiltrated the local crime ring and easily beaten back a collection of impotent Batman impersonators who see the caped crusader as a “symbol of good” and try to copy his behavior. His merciless methods belie the ever-present smile upon his face, and the local police, led by Lt. Jim Gordon (Gary Oldman), can’t find a way to stop his deadly assault upon the city. The Joker’s demand, made through multiple televised torture tapes, is that Batman reveal his true identity.
The Joker’s demented visage—he has white makeup and permanent smile—provide all we need to know for the reasons behind his rage. Director Chris Nolan defies any audience demand for an official explanation of the Joker’s malevolence by giving Ledger a couple of contradictory speeches about why he is the way he is. The Joker’s murky motivations matter little—he must be confronted and stopped before “everything burns,” as he says late in the film. He spreads terror through the use of the media—the videos he makes to alarm the citizens of Gotham are uneasy reminders of the hostage videos seen on the nightly news, while his confidence in carrying out his plans is so great that he places obituaries in the newspaper before killing his victims. The tactics create helplessness and fear among the citizens, who turn on the authorities before turning on each other.
Most Recent User Comments
WarriorJ
8/25/2008 2:41 AM
Good script and convincing performances by actors set in a macabre environment. Aside the utter abandonment of comic book lore surrounding Joker and Two Face the producers go out of their way to celebrate violence and destruction, a sad cry from the more constructive Batman movie of 1989 that does a better job balancing Good and Evil in Gotham City. Halfway though the movie the story is in a continual downward spiral from the sublime to the mundane. Despite the bombs on the boats that test ‘the populace’ integrity and renews our faith in humanity the constant barrage of disillusionment overshadows that effort. Moreover, at the end of the movie viewers are left with a very slim ray of hope…Batman is vilified except to the little boy who regards him as a hero and Gotham City is darker than ever “Hope deferred makes The Heart sick”. Not a movie for Christians who purpose to look at the world through God’s lenses and not Man’s, 1 Peter 3:8-9 and Philippians 4:8. MPAA Rating should be R
Report this post
Disciplefan
8/24/2008 2:53 PM
I watched The Dark Knight the weekend it came out I think its one of the best movies I have ever seen in my 8 years of watching movies. There are some negative comments from users about how dark this movie is. Those negative commentators should realize.... THATS THE WHOLE REASON FOR BATMANS EXISTENCE! IF GOTHAM CITY WASNT DARK, BATMAN WOULDNT HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT IT! I think those of you who commented so negatively on this movie are just paranoid. This movie is a great movie despite what all of you say. Be sure to read Giacooper465 comments on this movie.
sgtmattbaker
7/25/2008 5:34 PM
If you are not convicted against seeing a film that uses the Lord's name in vain, there that is your conviction. I am convicted to not see the film unless I do not hear such language. Some people don't notice it, but I have only been in the theatre for 30 seconds at a time (30 seconds max; we have to go in and check the theatres to make sure people aren't being obnoxious and that the sound is working, etc.) and the two times I have done so I almost immediately heard God's name used in vain both times. Poor timing? Probably, but I would most definitely hear and dislike hearing all 9 instances of blasphemy. I just don't think it was necessary for them to do it in the film. I also don't see it as justifiable, the actors (and subsequently the director) are using the Lord's name is such a trivial way as to simply portray shock in a film. I don't agree with that.
- Read more feedback
- Give us your feedback on this article - (login required to comment)
