Clever Premise Dumbed Down in Source Code
- Friday, April 01, 2011
Case in point: what happens between each eight-minute repeat. While the train memories dole out information at an appropriate pace that plays off mystery, the cockpit scenes get bogged down in an odd mix of information overload and undisclosed secrets.
On one hand, knowledge about this bizarre scenario, how it works, and how to navigate through it is laboriously unpacked to Colter (and us). The script feels obligated to explain more details than it needs to, geeking-out in its high concept, and takes too much time doing it.
On the other hand, Colter’s deeper questions—how is this happening, who is this for, is it even real, am I going to die?—go largely unanswered by Goodwin and her superior Dr. Rutledge (Jeffrey Wright, Quantum of Solace) who want Colter to stay focused on the task at hand, not why he’s in it or where it might lead to.
This ridiculous non-disclosure is the ultimate contrivance, i.e. if Colter knows what they know then we have no movie. Everything would run smoothly, efficiently, and much more quickly. There’d be no suspense, no drama, and no tension. A smarter script would’ve provided a justifiable reason for not answering Colter’s questions, but this one doesn’t.
Indeed, the very fact that he’s surprised to find himself in this scenario is baffling. As a “perfect candidate” for the procedure, why was Colter never prepped and trained for its eventual implementation? There’s no benefit to his disorientation or natural suspicions; they only cause delays. But hey, at least we have a suspense thriller now, right?
Along with the script’s holes of logic, the other head-scratcher is Colter’s reluctance to engage future missions for the new program. He wants a guarantee that once this one’s over, that it’ll be his last. He wants out (and the film portrays this as noble), even though he could literally save countless lives in the future if he remained. He’s offered any soldier’s dream, yet his desire is antithetical to the American soldier’s character. What ever happened to “I regret I have but one life to give for my country”?
Structurally, Source Code bears a strong resemblance to director Duncan Jones’ first film Moon from a couple of years ago; a hero stuck in a confined space, he’s subject to a governmental experiment, trapped in a cycle he can’t escape, looking for honest human contact (just to name a few). Yet Moon was far more successful in its minimalism, both as a character study as well as a thought-provoking treatise on human value. Here, unfortunately, conceptual and stylistic ambitions overwhelm thematic ones.
For all its dark implications, the film really pulls its punches in the final stretch as it tries to tie things up too nicely and neatly—especially the relationships. It leads to a bunch of schmaltz while reducing themes to one-line hypotheticals (“What would you do if you only had one minute to live?!”) and cheesy Hallmarkisms while leaving room for sequels. For a movie that considers itself thought-provoking, it has no business ending with the final line, “Everything’s going to be okay.”
- Drugs/Alcohol Content: None.
- Language/Profanity: Two uses of “g-d-d--n”, an s-word, and occasional milder profanities.
- Sexual Content/Nudity: Embracing, kissing. A crude sexual joke.
- Violence: Intense action involving explosions, and tension building to each explosion. Initially the effects are only implied or heard off-camera, but as the film progresses there are images of charred bodily remains, bodies beginning to be consumed by explosions. An exposed brain, a severed body. Not bloody, but could be scary for children.
Recently on Movies
Have something to say about this article? Leave your comment via Facebook below!
Listen to Your Favorite Pastors
Add Crosswalk.com content to your siteBrowse available content