E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
MOVIES Sponsorship

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Product photo

Twisted Reasoning Makes for Scatterbrained Secrets

Annabelle Robertson

Entertainment Critic

DVD Release Date:  June 5, 2007
Rating:  Unrated
Genre:  Educational/Documentary
Run Time: 87 min.
Director:  Jonathan Stack
Narrator: Susan Sarandon

[WARNING:  This review includes references to female genitalia which is discussed in terms of symbolism in Secrets of the Code.  Parents, please exercise caution with young readers.]

In 2003, The Da Vinci Code was published amid widespread controversy—and angry protests from Christians all around the world.  The novel, by author Dan Brown, became the fastest selling adult novel in history and transformed Brown into a billionaire.  And although the story that it tells is fiction, religious leaders around the world continue to be outraged by the inscription at the beginning of the book which states that the facts contained therein are “true.”

The Da Vinci Code recounts the story of a murder investigation which led to a series of clues—clues that were supposedly encrypted into a code by Leonardo Da Vinci.  When the main characters in the book broke the “code,” they also unearthed a secret that had allegedly been suppressed by religious leaders for thousands of years.  The secret?  That Jesus Christ had a relationship with, married and impregnated Mary Magdalene, who was also one of his apostles.

In this film, which is based on the book edited by Dan Burstein, narrator Susan Sarandon waxes about the importance of story, then states that Brown’s story is “just a story.”  Sarandon then attempts, however, to prove just the opposite.  Brown’s story about Mary Magdalene, she insists (along with a host of erudite academics), is actually the “true story” of the New Testament.  Brown should therefore be commended—lauded, even—for finally bringing this into the light, and for bringing back “the sacred feminine” to religion once again.

It is this metaphor, the sacred feminine, which dominates the first part of the film.  We are escorted into an unnamed forest by author Duncan Caldwell, an American academic.  As Caldwell caresses a large rock in the woods, he says, “This is a very erotic experience.”  He then points to some indentations in the rock.  “This is a vulva,” he says.

Next, Caldwell takes us into some nearby caves, where he again interprets markings on the wall as female genitalia.  “We’re within the earth’s vulva,” he says, barely containing the excitement n his voice.  “This rock is the membrane between here and the beyond…anyone who doubts this—here’s the proof!”

We then meet a Jewish rabbi who insists that the sexual act is a metaphor for the sacred.  “When you’re making love,” he says, “you say, ‘Oh, God.’  You don’t say, ‘Oh, toaster.’  It’s a code for the deepest connection and intimacy.”

1 | 2 | Next | All
Most Recent User Comments
Be the first to comment on this article!
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!