AVERAGE USER RATING
Recently On Movies
Featured Sponsors
Powerful "Dark Knight" a Solid Superhero Film
Christian Hamaker
Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer
Release Date: July 18, 2008
Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of violence and some menace)
Genre: Action, Crime, Sequel
Run Time: 152 min.
Director: Chris Nolan
Actors: Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Aaron Eckhart, Gary Oldman, Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman
“Some men can’t be bullied or negotiated with,” Alfred the butler (Michael Caine) says to Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) in the summer’s most anticipated movie, The Dark Knight. “Some men just want to watch the world burn.”
It’s a troubling truth—one of many expressed in this newest film in the Batman franchise, which shows the impact such men have on Gotham City and the limited power of those who want to change things for the better.
For fans of the Batman franchise, this sequel to Batman Begins (which restarted the franchise in 2005) turns out to have been worth the wait. Grim and morally complex, The Dark Knight not only explores the dark side of human nature but draws potent parallels with the current war on terrorism, leaving viewers to wrestle with questions of how to respond to injustice.
Bruce Wayne wants to rid Gotham City of mob influence, but the mob has problems of its own. Not only is prosecutor Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) working hard to bring them down, but a villain named the Joker (Heath Ledger) has infiltrated the local crime ring and easily beaten back a collection of impotent Batman impersonators who see the caped crusader as a “symbol of good” and try to copy his behavior. His merciless methods belie the ever-present smile upon his face, and the local police, led by Lt. Jim Gordon (Gary Oldman), can’t find a way to stop his deadly assault upon the city. The Joker’s demand, made through multiple televised torture tapes, is that Batman reveal his true identity.
The Joker’s demented visage—he has white makeup and permanent smile—provide all we need to know for the reasons behind his rage. Director Chris Nolan defies any audience demand for an official explanation of the Joker’s malevolence by giving Ledger a couple of contradictory speeches about why he is the way he is. The Joker’s murky motivations matter little—he must be confronted and stopped before “everything burns,” as he says late in the film. He spreads terror through the use of the media—the videos he makes to alarm the citizens of Gotham are uneasy reminders of the hostage videos seen on the nightly news, while his confidence in carrying out his plans is so great that he places obituaries in the newspaper before killing his victims. The tactics create helplessness and fear among the citizens, who turn on the authorities before turning on each other.
Most Recent User Comments
sgtmattbaker
7/25/2008 5:34 PM
If you are not convicted against seeing a film that uses the Lord's name in vain, there that is your conviction. I am convicted to not see the film unless I do not hear such language. Some people don't notice it, but I have only been in the theatre for 30 seconds at a time (30 seconds max; we have to go in and check the theatres to make sure people aren't being obnoxious and that the sound is working, etc.) and the two times I have done so I almost immediately heard God's name used in vain both times. Poor timing? Probably, but I would most definitely hear and dislike hearing all 9 instances of blasphemy. I just don't think it was necessary for them to do it in the film. I also don't see it as justifiable, the actors (and subsequently the director) are using the Lord's name is such a trivial way as to simply portray shock in a film. I don't agree with that.
Report this post
giacooper465
7/25/2008 9:02 AM
I feel like several people have attacked me personally because I saw the movie and enjoyed it--though God's name was apparently used in vain. I didn't know that it was in there when I bought my ticket, nor can I honestly say that I even heard it used in vain.
Let me make this clear, I do not feel that I did anything wrong in the eyes on the Lord when I saw that movie, nor do I feel that I need to repent of anything.
I would like to say that I am thankful God has grace and and compassion
Let me make this clear, I do not feel that I did anything wrong in the eyes on the Lord when I saw that movie, nor do I feel that I need to repent of anything.
I would like to say that I am thankful God has grace and and compassion
sgtmattbaker
7/24/2008 9:17 PM
Personally, this is the only movie I want to see all year and the fact that I am not able to is really irritating to me. I also work at a movie theatre so it isn't any better. I have been trying to in the back of my mind justify the film so I could see it, but I am really convicted that the blasphemy isn't acceptable. I have been thinking of ways to avoid hearing the language too, like playing loud music in my headphones at the parts where the phrases come up, but there are a couple problems with that solution too. 1) The music may not be loud enough to drown out the word, or if it is it will make my eardrums bleed. 2) I know where 3 of the phrases occur (having to check the auditoriums at work to make sure the sound is working, etc. :-( ) but the other 6 I do not know. I am going to loathe waiting until December (most likely) to see this movie.
- Read more feedback
- Give us your feedback on this article - (login required to comment)
