So what’s to like? For starters, the title character is admirable in his willingness to help others, and in the way he carries out his ideas of what it means to be “a gentleman.” He’s also not afraid to be different, nor is Roscuro. The film has a message about the dangers of nonconformity, but that nonconformity is more about acceptance of personal talent and physical appearance than it is about flouting moral guidelines. The “rules” that Despereaux breaks are not well explained by any of those who have authority over him, so younger viewers looking for ammunition in the film to defy the authority figures in their own lives will be disappointed (unless those authority figures have done as poor a job of explaining their guidelines as have Despereaux’s parents, and the mouse council).
More open-ended is a question posed by the story’s narrator, who asks, “What happens when you make something illegal that is just part of the natural world?” Older children may wonder how this question relates to things like drugs and sexuality, so parents should be prepared to discuss those issues should they come up. But the film’s target audience is probably a bit too young to make such connections.
The film also raises questions about why a creature of darkness would literally be drawn to the light, and about what it means to be honorable, chivalrous, and gentlemanly. It also demonstrates the liberating power of forgiveness offered and received. (The narrator’s late comment suggesting that the events in the film might have been attributable to “good luck” is unfortunate and works against what the story suggests up until that point.)
The Tale of Despereaux is fitfully delightful, and should satisfy most family audiences. It’s not a perfect movie, and it departs from DiCamillo’s book in some important ways. But overall, the story’s power translates well enough for the movie to be recommended.
Questions? Concerns? Contact the writer at crosswalkchristian@verizon.net.
CAUTIONS: