E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
PASTORS & LEADERSHIP Sponsorship

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Product photo

Is the Doctrine of Election Biblical?

John MacArthur

Grace to You

Among the most hotly contested and persistent debates in the history of the confessing church, the doctrine of election is perhaps the greatest of all. The question goes like this: Does God choose sinners to be saved and then provide for their salvation? Or, Does God provide the way of salvation that sinners must choose for themselves?

Where's the evidence?

This question of choice is called “election” because of the Greek word for those who are chosen—the Bible calls them eklektos. There are many such uses in the Bible (cf. Col. 3:12; 1 Tim. 5:21; Tit. 1:1; 2 John 1), but one of my favorites is in Romans 8:33: “Who will bring a charge against God’s elect?” The answer is, “no one,” but why? Is it because I chose God, or is it because God chose me?

One passage that is critical to the discussion is in the opening chapter of Paul’s letter to the Ephesians. Immediately after his customary greeting, Paul launches in Ephesians 1:3-14 with a great song of praise. It’s only one sentence—but, with 200 words in the Greek, it may be the longest single sentence in religious literature.

Paul touches on all the great biblical themes in that hyper-complex sentence—sanctification, adoption, redemption, and glorification—and all of them rest on one foundational doctrine, the doctrine of election. The most superlative spiritual blessings stand on Ephesians 1:4—“He chose us [elected us] in Him before the foundation of the world.”

So the doctrine of election is biblical, but what does that passage really teach? I want to help you get a better grasp of that by pointing out what Paul teaches about election. If you are a believer, you can equip yourself for your next conversation on this topic. But more important, as one of His elect you can rejoice in the astonishing kindness God showed you before the world began.

What does it mean?

Paul’s song is essentially his reflection on the amazing truth that God “blessed us with every spiritual blessing … in Christ” (v. 3). And how did He bless us? “He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world” (Eph. 1:4).

God didn’t draw straws; He didn’t look down the corridor of time to see who would choose Him before He decided. Rather, by His sovereign will He chose who would be in the Body of Christ. The construction of the Greek verb for “chose” indicates God chose us for Himself. That means God acted totally independent of any outside influence. He made His choice totally apart from human will and purely on the basis of His sovereignty.

Jesus said to His disciples, “You did not choose Me, but I chose you” (John 15:16). And in the same Gospel, John wrote, “But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God” (1:12-13, italics mine). And Paul said, “But we should always give thanks to God for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God has chosen you from the beginning for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and faith in the truth” (2 Thess. 2:13).

1 | 2 | Next | All
Most Recent User Comments
elderdxc
9/25/2007 1:14 PM
The author refers to Paul's commments about the potter and the clay, saying that this answers the objection. I still have doubts. After all what works perfectly well for a non-sentient vessel of clay kind of breaks down when it is applied to a living being. Two clay pots cannot tell if one is used to hold gold and the other is used to hold waste material. The people who go to heaven and the ones who go to hell, on the other hand, will feel their situation very differently.

It does seem hard that God should condemn someone who, according to Calvinism, could do nothing whatsoever to escape this condemnation. It is just like blaming the children of kidnapped Africans for being slaves in Mississippi.

While I do believe in the Perseverance of the Saints, I am still uncertain about how the election issue plays out.
richschmidt
9/24/2007 7:13 PM
Interesting that you lead off with Ephesians 1. Because after starting with "he chose us in him before the creation of the world" in verse 4, Paul continues in verse 13 with, "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal..." Back up one verse to verse 12 and you see Paul talking about "we, who were the first to hope in Christ..."

It appears that in the first 12 verses Paul is talking about himself and the first believers (the Jewish believers?), while the rest of us (Gentiles) have been grafted in on the basis of hearing and believing the good news. This fits perfectly with God's choosing of Israel in the Old Testament, and with the rest of Ephesians, where Paul spends quite a bit of time dealing with Jew-and-Gentile issues.

It seems to me that a careful reading of Eph. 1 leads to a different understanding than the one presented in the article.
knightday1973
9/23/2007 1:10 PM
I found on this issue there is rarely any depth going into it.

I think that a reading of Plantinga's Free Will Defense would be useful on a topic like this.

There is no real reason it cannot be BOTH election and freely accepting Christ. God elects you and you freely accept Him as Lord and Saviour. How could it be otherwise? God knows what you will do. He knows whether you will accept Him or not. Foreknowing this He elects as you as well. They can be compatible decision at the 'same time' in God's view. In a sense we by our freewill actions helped decide what world ( state of affairs- see Plantinga Nature of necessity) God would create. The idea of being coworkers with God could lend some support to this kind of idea. There is a cooperation between the wills. We bend our will to His and there is cooperation and yet God allows for us to make decisions on our own ( Adam naming animals ex.)

By the way I don't see 'accepting' Christ as a work or something worthy of merit. Accepting conditions on a contract is not 'doing works'.

The verses that seem contradictory appear to me to become harmonious when taking into account God's foreknowledge and our freewill together. I think this possibility is probable as one way of seeing it.


Steve
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!