E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
PASTORS & LEADERSHIP Sponsorship

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Concerning Alcoholic Beverages

Concerning Alcoholic Beverages

Paige Patterson

Baptist Press

Editor's Note: In 2006, the Southern Baptist Convention approved a resolution which not only expressed opposition to church members drinking alcohol, but also stipulated that no one who does so may be elected to serve within the denomination. Seminary president Paige Patterson supported the stand with a look at Scripture's warnings about strong drink.

FORT WORTH -- References to wine are frequent in both the Old and New Testaments. The Masoretic text of the Old Testament employs the Hebrew word yayin in the vast majority of cases -- 141 times to be exact. A handful of other words are translated “wine” but not with enough frequency to matter. The Greek term oinos is used predominantly in the New Testament, and coming through Latin is transliterated into English as “wine.” The Greek term gleukos (literally, “sweet wine”) is sometimes used.

The wines varied in kind and strength. However, four basic varieties may be distinguished, all of which are described indiscriminately by oinos:

  1. Freshly pressed grape juice, which had been stomped out by the, hopefully, clean feet of a local family in their private wine vats, or else crushed in grape presses of stone. In the climate of Palestine, fermentation began within 24 hours, so pure unfermented grape juice was available only for a brief time.
  2. The initial, violent, foaming fermentation process lasted about one week. The wine was then transferred to new wineskins for 40 days of further fermentation. The heavier matter, “lees” or “dregs,” would settle to the bottom, and then the wine would be drawn off, providing the daily drink.
  3. Sometimes the wine would be left on the lees to ferment still further. This provided a real knock-out punch, one evidently imbibed by only a few since it often turned insipid and unbearable (Jeremiah 48:11).
  4. Wine frequently was diluted with water or herbs or both. On the cross, Jesus was offered such a concoction of cheap, low-grade wine, which He refused.

The Attitude of Scripture

In strict fairness, one must acknowledge that the ancients, however noble, imbibed without reluctance. Evidently the prophets and the apostles did not view this as wrong, so long as it was a small glass of wine (see varieties Nos. 1, 2 or 4 mentioned above) taken with the noon or evening meal. These wines, of course, were locally produced.

At this point, however, a significant difference exists between what is permissible and what is best for the child of God. In addition to the constant clear identification of drunkenness as a highly disreputable and debilitating sort of sin, please note the following:

-- The Nazarite (one who was especially separated unto God) was prohibited from the use of wine altogether (see Numbers 6:3Judges 13:4-713-14).

-- In Jeremiah 35:1-10, the Rechabites are highly commended by God and by Jeremiah for their total abstinence.

-- John the Baptist, touted by Jesus as “the greatest born among men,” was a total abstainer. He was evidently patterning his lifestyle after that of the Nazarite Law, and thereby expressing God’s prescription for what is the best for a godly man. In fact, the angelic announcement to Zacharias prohibited John the Baptist from using any wine (Luke 1:15). Here also is noted the first specific contrast between the fullness of the Spirit and the use of wine. This contrast occurs again at Pentecost in Acts 2, and again in Ephesians 5:18.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | All
Most Recent User Comments
zooch234
8/28/2009 1:33 AM
You know this argument has raged for years and years and is fruitless really, first of all if the guests at the wedding were drunk they must have had fermented wine but to me the issue is causing a brother to stumble, why as a born again person would you want to drink any kind of strong drink, and take the chance of being stopped by the police or whatever, in the state of Washington two glasses of wine would put you in trouble, and after even a single glass of sparkling wine you are ever so slightly over the edge.
In our Charismatic churches that have all of a sudden become drinkers a little bit of wine and a little bit of clothes leads to a lot of trouble.
I was at a conference the other day in Wales and it was attended by a large number of new Charismatic Pastors, out of the 12 only 3 of us did not drink, the Pastors wife of one of the largest Charismatic churches in the world today is a drinker, I just pray that she is never stopped by the police, DUI Pastors wife!!!!!
Augustino
8/6/2009 1:41 PM
Dr. Patterson states "In strict fairness, one must acknowledge that the ancients imbibed without reluctance." Then Patterson makes an unsubstantiated claim that the water-into-wine produced by Jesus must have been grape juice. He asserts, "Furthermore, the ancients always acknowledged that the best oinos was the unfermented oinos".
What? Traditionally, every culture, modern and ancient, celebrates weddings with fermented wine and esteems it to be the best fruit of the vine.
Failure to cite valid references for his inferences makes this article non-relevant to non-choir members. When the choir is preached to, indoctrination takes place instead of teaching. When the choir meets the world they lack the means to teach what the world needs to hear.
Also, why the baffling use of scripture? The skeptic is quick to notice "not given to drunkenness", as stated in 1 Tim 3:3, is not the equivalent of Patterson's translation, translation, translation, “The bishop is to be free from wine”.
Does Christianity.com review submissions and provide editorial assistance to authors prior to posting their articles?
churchsinger
8/1/2009 1:56 PM
I agree with this article for the most part, except for the part where the author says no one is sure if Jesus drank the wine.

In the Scriptures, priests were forbidden to even look at strong drink, much less drink it. Since Jesus was the High Priest after the Order of Melchisidec, he would be violating the Law by drinking any fermented wine. If he drank anything, it would have to be the new wine just made.

Also fermentation in the bible is the symbol for sin and decay.Just like the jews could not eat unlevened bread during Passover, it was the same with wine.

So with can say with certainty that Jesus did not drink strong drink, and when he changed the water into wine, it was the new unfermented wine.
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!