Separate The Da Vinci Code's Fiction from Fact
- Monday, May 02, 2005
The novel The Da Vinci Code has captured the popular imagination, becoming a bestseller and an upcoming major motion picture. But while the story it tells is riveting, its author Dan Brown's claims that the story is based in fact have confused many readers.
Among other things, The Da Vinci Code declares that Jesus was merely a mortal prophet, not divine, and that He was married to Mary Magdalene. Such assertions have outraged many faithful Christians. But those who haven't investigated the true historical facts can easily be led astray by Brown's novel.
Separating fiction from fact is crucial when it comes to something as important as faith. So here are some significant ways The Da Vinci Code confuses readers - and the truth that breaks the code:
Basic historical facts are presented inaccurately. Although the novel asserts that it's facts are correct, it contains a wide variety of historical errors on issues such as: church architecture, religious symbolism, the Roman Empire (including the history of the Olympics), tarot cards, the origin of Sunday as the Christian Sabbath day, practices in the temples of ancient Israel, different spiritual belief systems, and God's original name.
Since Brown's credibility as an author who can accurately recount history is what undergirds his assertions about even more significant topics - such as Jesus' divinity and marital status - his many mistakes reporting on history damage his credibility.
The Bible's formation is misrepresented, and the interaction between Christians and Gnostics is twisted. The Da Vinci Code contains factual errors involving the Roman Emperor Constantine's beliefs, how the Bible was developed, how heretics were defined, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and accounts of Jesus' life. For example, Brown claims that church leaders under Constantine rewrote the Gospels to embellish them and omitted "earthly" aspects of Jesus' life from official accounts.
But in fact, there is no historical evidence showing that the Gospels were ever changed. And they contain many scenes of Jesus' earthly life, including his physical limitations (hunger, fatigue, death), his human emotions (anguish, sadness, outrage), and his relationships with people (his mother, friends, and followers).
Assertions about Mary Magdalene, Jesus' divinity, and goddess worship are wrong. Contrary to what Brown writes, Mary Magdalene was not Jesus' wife, but simply a friend and follower. None of the Christian or Gnostic gospels mention any marriage between them, and Brown's interpretation of a passage that he says shows a romance between them is based on an inaccurate translation. Also, there was no conspiracy to make Jesus divine through a vote at the Council of Nicea, as Brown claims.
There was no need for one, because His followers saw Him as the promised Messiah from the earliest years of Christianity. He also proved His divinity through His resurrection and subsequent appearances to many people over the course of 40 days. Jesus' divinity was widely acknowledged years before the Council of Nicea. The novel also contains errors relating to Eve's role in the fall of mankind, the church's respect for women, goddess worship, witch hunts, the Jewish view of marriage, Mary Magdalene's reputation and relationship to church leaders, the Merovingians, and Jesus' lineage.
Recently on Spiritual Life
Have something to say about this article? Leave your comment via Facebook below!
Listen to Your Favorite Pastors
Add Crosswalk.com content to your siteBrowse available content