Declare Your Faith - Sign the "I Am a Christian" Pledge
E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
HOME

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
The Rise of 'By Choice' Single Mothers

The Rise of 'By Choice' Single Mothers

Albert Mohler

President, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary


September 19, 2008

Social change is a constant in civilization.  New technologies, human migrations, climate changes, and any number of demographic and worldview shifts prompt changes in the way humans live and maintain civilization's patterns and structures.  For the most part, these changes unfold slowly.  Now, however, we are witnessing social change unwind at warp speed.

Just consider the disappearance of marriage as the expectation for many young adults and the disappearance of the father from many families.

The Guardian [London] reports on the phenomenon of "choice mothers" who have opted for what some observers call "single motherhood by choice."  The number of unmarried women who want to have a child by artificial insemination is growing at an unprecedented rate, even as the age of women seeking to conceive a child without a father is dropping.

As the paper reports:

A survey of attitudes towards contraception out this week appears to confirm this as a trend. Both men and women said they had serious concerns about whether they would meet the right partner in time to conceive naturally; and 56% of the women asked said they would consider asking a male friend to father their child if they failed to find a partner by a certain age. And it was younger women - those aged between 28 and 31 - who were the most likely to go it alone if the right man did not turn up in time.

Seeking artificial insemination in your 20s or 30s is not unusual among lesbians (who have no reason to delay), but heterosexual women typically wait to see if they can find a partner first. Using a sperm donor has always been a last resort. Now the process is becoming a first resort. Say that you are in your early 30s and you are convinced your life will not be complete without a child. Why wait? Many women have financial independence earlier in life than in the past and few see being a single mother as a situation that carries a stigma. Many single mothers by choice argue that they see couples struggling with the difficult issues that shared parenting raises. Women in this category who know that they definitely want a baby are less concerned about raising a child alone than they are about waiting for the "right man" for so long that they miss their fertility window.

There is so much to unpack in this report.  At one level, this points to the natural desire of women for children -- a desire that is, in itself, both understandable and admirable.  Indeed, Christians will rightly believe that this is a desire given to a woman by the Creator.  At another level, even this newspaper recognizes that there is something sad about so many young women giving up on another natural desire -- the desire for a husband (though the paper uses the politically-correct term, "partner").  Christians would see this, too, as evidence of God's intention.

The result of this is the redefinition of the family before our eyes, with so many young women choosing to have children even as they have no plans for any present or future marriage.  These children will know no father and the entire social fabric is unraveled that much further.

The institution of marriage is the Creator's gift -- an institution that constitutes the only natural, holy, and wholesome context in which all of these desires are fulfilled.  But marriage has been subverted by divorce, cohabitation, contraceptive and reproductive technologies, and a host of ideological and cultural influences.

Our cultural obsession with a false ideal of personal autonomy promises us all that we can have whatever we want, and on our own terms.  This sad report serves to remind us that, left to our own, we will try to create our own reality and have what we want without accepting what we really need.

Fathers are missing from this picture, but so is something even more fundamental -- God's gift of marriage and the glory of God evident in the perfection of His gifts.


In addition to being one of Salem’s nationally syndicated radio talk show hosts, R. Albert Mohler, Jr. is the president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky and recognized as one of America’s leading theologians and cultural commentators. Contact Dr. Mohler at mail@albertmohler.com.

Most Recent User Comments
silent12
11/7/2009 9:14 AM
Firstly, in Britain there are not lots of children without families. People can wait up to 10 years for a child; and that's not a rare case. Most of the children available are older and have learning/behavioural difficulties.
These young women won't have experience of caring for children like this and so it is likely they will turned away.
As for adopting from another country, although it may "help" the single child, it will not help the country. It is v. likely that this child will be over a year and therefore will have missed vital development and need extra help; something which a first time, single parent might struggle with.
Secondly, these are often intelligent, psychologlically stable, well off women. They are the sort of women who should be having children at this point in their lives; in contrast to the teenagers who are likely to be from a lower economic background, suffered early trauma and have a lower iq.
Which of these do you think should be having children?
arum
10/25/2008 8:19 AM
As jpc4c has said, why create more deliberately fatherless children? There are so many out there who could be fostered or adopted. I don't know about the US but in many countries you are allowed to adopt as a single woman. Interestingly here in Britain, I don't believe you are allowed to adopt as a single person, although you can foster, but a gay couple may adopt!

But to return to the issue at hand, it is ultimately a very selfish thing to want to create a child who will grow up without a father, just to satisfy the woman's own desire to be a mother. As the author of the article points out, the social fabric will just unravel that much more. God help us.

jpc4c
10/11/2008 11:59 AM
I do think that it is sad that these women are using scientific methods to become pregnant as opposed to the family system that God originally gave. However, I think that many of these women who are choosing to have a family without a father may have come from the vast amount of homes today in which "dads" have failed their families and tainted the daughters, who have now grown up to become mothers, view of what a father could and should be. Dad's if your out there, love and cherish your daughters and teach your sons to love and cherish women, teach your children to be responsible and moral, teach them to have integrity so they will be able to continue on with the ideal family system God intended. I do not condemn any woman who has chosen to take this route; however, I do feel that making the choice to become pregnant through artificial means on your own is not ideal, why "create" more children when there are so many kids out there who need good parents or "a" good parent. adoption??
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!