Declare Your Faith - Sign the "I Am a Christian" Pledge
E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
HOME

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Optional Orthodoxy: God, Grace, and Gay Sex

Optional Orthodoxy: God, Grace, and Gay Sex

Jim Tonkowich

Institute on Religion & Democracy


February 20, 2009

The March issues of The Atlantic and First Things arrived together. In The Atlantic, Paul Elie writes about Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury. The article, “The Velvet Reformation,” is billed on the cover as “God, Grace & Gay Sex.” You have to love marketing.

First Things has a January 1997 article by the late Richard John Neuhaus entitled “The Unhappy Fate of Optional Orthodoxy.” The two articles need to be read together.

Elie writes: 

At a time when Christianity is twisted into a pretzel over the issue of homosexuality, Rowan Williams—alone among the top Christian leaders—is trying to carry on a conversation about it. His approach has been quixotic, at times baffling. But the long-term goal seems clear: to enable the church he leads to become fully open to gays and lesbians without breaking apart.

He points to “The Body’s Grace,” a lecture given by Williams in 1989 to the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement as one of his finest hours. In it Elie notes that Williams argues, “Gay people, too, deserve to be wanted sexually—deserve the body’s grace.”

Of course, grace is by definition undeserved, but we will bypass that and go on his idea that we all “deserve to be wanted sexually.” For Williams, this is central. In his lecture, he stated, “So my desire, if it is going to be sustained and developed, must itself be perceived; and, if it is to develop as it naturally tends to, it must be perceived as desirable by the other—that is my arousal and desire must become the cause of someone else’s desire….” According to Williams, sexual desire demands satisfaction by another.

1 | 2 | 3 | Next | All
Most Recent User Comments
peterhunt
8/13/2009 4:19 AM
I agree with you all. We mustn't be intimidated into accpeting arguments and views that are simply not biblical. When people talk to me about this issue I ask them to read Romans 1 and ask them what it means. Even is they won't answer you they will remember that God's word is clear on the issue and has the answer to sin and healing for the brokenness it brings to lives.
joyfulovercomer
3/2/2009 3:22 PM
I TOTALLY agree with what the others had to say, sin is sin.
It is not only a sin but God called homosexuality an abomination. Although I can't agree with their lifestyle I believe that they need to be treated with kindness; no hate crimes. After all they are human and deserve the same respect as any other human does...in this country or elsewhere.
CaptAudio
3/2/2009 2:22 PM
If we are to reach out to homosexuals and lesbians, how about a movement to create a church for adulterers, theives, murderers, all those that sin. We could have an adulterer that had been so experienced, to be the pastor, etc. Adulterers for Elders, etc. What's the difference? Sin is sin. People are not born homosexual. They chose to live that lifestyle. How many times do you have a Doctor come out and tell a father that his wife has just given birth to a male homosexual? Come on, we're just not as stupid as you might think the Body of Christ is. We also know when we're dealing with wolves in sheep's clothing.
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!