Crosswalk.com aims to offer the most compelling biblically-based content to Christians on their walk with Jesus. Crosswalk.com is your online destination for all areas of Christian Living – faith, family, fun, and community. Each category is further divided into areas important to you and your Christian faith including Bible study, daily devotions, marriage, parenting, movie reviews, music, news, and more.

GO

Dr. Paul J. Dean Christian Blog and Commentary

Dr. Paul J. Dean

Follow us on Facebook

Get Dr. Paul J. Dean article updates directly to your News Feed.

Follow us on Facebook

Recommend this article to your friends.

Comments

What’s happened to good manners in the South? The New York Times reported that while good manners have always been part of a Southerner’s identity in some sense, they are no longer a priority. Men are less apt to give up their seats for ladies, people are less openly friendly or deferential, and terms of respect when addressing others have all but disappeared. As school teacher Dana Mason pointed out, “parents who move South tell her they don’t want their children to learn to say ‘yes, sir’ or ‘yes, ma’am.’ Too demeaning, they say.”

A number of reasons have been offered to explain the decline in manners in Southern culture. Some posit that “strict rules regarding courtesy and deference to others have historically been used as a way to enforce a social order in which women and blacks were considered less than full citizens . . . as a way to smooth the edges of a harsh racial system.” Presumably they are no longer needed? Others blame the influx of newcomers as the South is the fastest growing region in the country. Scholars point to digital communication, globalization, economic insecurity, and other complexities. Mason blames “a faster pace of life and the demise of the home-cooked family meal.” The world is changing in general. Southern weddings are no longer about catering to the guests but to the bride and groom due to a self-centered age; civility in political discourse and customs of respect are all but gone as partisanship has become ultimate; and two-working parents in one home don’t have the time or desire to focus on manners. Some point out that manners are often a way of keeping space between oneself and others. A decline in “bless your heart” fakeness therefore may be a good thing.

What are we to make of this development and these explanations?

Manners are the product of a Christian worldview. It’s not that everyone who appreciates and practices good manners is a Christian, but it is the case that those who appreciate and practice good manners have been influenced by a Christian worldview whether they realize it or not. Manners are rooted in things like love for neighbor, respect for others, a consideration of others before oneself, a desire to be kind, humility, deference to others, etc. They put God’s character on display. Such things make no sense on an evolutionary worldview where it’s every man for himself. They make no sense on a relativistic worldview where there is no standard of what’s polite or impolite. And other religions that promote some form of good will among neighbors have simply borrowed from the biblical worldview. From the time of creation and throughout history two things have been true: first, all human beings are created in the image of God and bear His stamp upon their consciences (Romans 1-2); second, the entire world has been affected in one way or another at some point by God’s truth, (though it’s been seriously distorted).

There is no doubt that manners linger in the Southern United States more so than in the Northern United States as the Christian worldview has lingered in the South longer. At the same time, it is no surprise that manners are on the decline in the South as the Christian worldview is increasingly eroded. Other worldviews are taking hold in Southern culture – worldviews that care little for others or what they think.

And yes, there is insincerity in the expression of manners on the part of many – the “bless your heart” mentality that says one thing and thinks or does another. It is interesting that some scholars would suggest that manners should be set aside because of that insincerity. The notion is that manners themselves are somehow inherently flawed or outmoded and that we would have a more honest society without them. But insincerity is the result of human sin and not a flaw in the concept of manners themselves. Does it even make sense to say that being nice to someone is inherently flawed and therefore we should not be nice to others? Does it make sense to say that good manners are “too demeaning?” Of course it doesn’t. But once the Christian worldview is rejected, we have no real basis to understand or explain anything and all we can do is grope in the dark. The numerous explanations for a decline of manners in the South highlight that reality. Those explanations are rooted in symptoms and not in a cause. But the Bible gives us a cause – human sin.

“Keepers of Southern civility maintain that manners will always be a defining characteristic of the region. One of them is Dorothy McLeod, 70, of Augusta, Ga., who has spent decades teaching thousands of children ballroom dance and etiquette. . . . [She is] firm in her belief that Southerners still want to raise children who are kind and well-mannered.” With all due respect to Mrs. McLeod, her belief is rooted in wishful thinking in the face of cultural evidence to the contrary. Manners will cease to be a defining characteristic of the South unless the church reasserts itself and that won’t happen unless the church wakes up and ceases going to church and starts being the church once again. Of course, good manners in the South are not the motivation for the church to be the church, but they, along with a lot of other benefits to society, will be part of the result.

 

Dr. Paul Dean invites you to discover more about the role of Government, the role of the church, and the role of the market  . . . and develop a Christian worldview. Dr. Dean is a pastor, cultural commentator, and author. Please visit http://www.governmentcurrentevents.com

Follow us on Facebook

Recommend this article to your friends.

Comments

Debate routinely swirls around accused terrorists or enemy combatants of the United States concerning whether or not they have a right to due process. An answer to that question may be determined case to case. Unfortunately, rhetoric and political posturing from both sides often clouds the real issues and the principles that undergird them. For the Christian, principle must always trump politics and indeed personal prejudice.

Let me illustrate. Suppose a U.S. citizen has called for terrorist attacks against the United States. He is now an avowed enemy of the U.S. In response, this avowed enemy is targeted by the U.S. government and subsequently taken out by the U.S. military. In an effort to defend the actions of the U.S. government, a Christian commentator begins to talk about the difference between U.S. citizens and enemies of the U.S. He talks about citizens having the right to due process but not self-avowed enemies. He then talks about the fact that American citizens, not enemies, have been granted unalienable rights by the U.S. Constitution.

There’s a problem; by definition, unalienable rights are not granted by government but by God. That’s why they’re unalienable; no one has the right to separate a person from rights granted by God. The American founders did not come up with those rights but rather recognized them from the Creator. While many of America’s founding documents refer to unalienable rights, the Declaration of Independence puts it this way: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men. . . .” The role of government is to secure the rights granted to us by God, not grant them to us. If government granted them to us then government could revoke them.

The upshot of this truth is simple: if these rights are unalienable and granted to us by God, then all human beings have been granted these rights, not Americans only and certainly not loyal Americans only. They are not derived from the U.S. Constitution but from God. A man may forfeit his right to life or liberty to be sure. But that doesn’t mean he doesn’t possess them until that determination is properly made.

What’s the real point? The issue is not that Christians sometimes misspeak, though sometimes we do. The issue is that sometimes Christians allow their feelings or their political persuasion to trump biblical principles. Regardless of how we feel about a person or a situation, the Scriptures must be our authority. Our thoughts on whether or not this avowed enemy should be targeted and taken out by the U.S. government must be determined on biblical grounds and not on fleshly or nationalistic grounds. Because all persons have certain unalienable rights, not just loyal Americans, we cannot argue the rightness of the government’s actions on the grounds that avowed enemies or non-U.S. citizens don’t have unalienable rights. We have to find another argument, and that argument must be rooted in biblical principles.

We’re not partisans; we’re Christians. As Christians we have a higher allegiance than the U.S. government. Our allegiance is to Christ. It’s His kingdom we’re seeking to advance. That means our focus must always be on that reality even when, and perhaps especially when, we’re talking in the public arena about what someone or some government ought to do and why. Personal prejudice or partisan politics will never change anyone’s life or advance God’s kingdom. Those things come about by the powerful propagation of the truth.

 

Dr. Paul Dean invites you to discover more about the role of Government, the role of the church, and the role of the market  . . . and develop a Christian worldview. Dr. Dean is a pastor, cultural commentator, and author. Please visit http://www.governmentcurrentevents.com

Follow us on Facebook

Recommend this article to your friends.

Comments

There is an ongoing dialogue in some circles as to whether the world would be better off without religion. To advance that dialogue, Slate/Intelligence Squared is sponsoring a debate concerning the impact of religion on the modern world. From the extended advertisement: “Religious zealots bomb buses filled with civilians, force genital mutilation, and wage holy wars in the name of faith. But believers also donate staggering amounts of time and money to faith-based charities, and strive to be good by devoting themselves to a set of commandments and credos. Does religion lead to more evil or more good? Was Blaise Pascal right when he decried religion, saying, ‘Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction’? ... Does religion breed intolerance and violence? Or has it primarily been a source for good, imbuing followers with purpose and encouraging moral behavior?”

While the debate will be interesting, four things strike me immediately.

First, religion is a set of beliefs concerning origin, meaning, ethics, death, etc. It is one’s worldview, philosophy, ideology, or belief system. While Slate is talking about organized religion, the truth is that everyone has a belief system and therefore everyone has a religion, including atheists. So to say that the world would be better off without religion makes no sense. We can no more escape having a worldview than we could escape having a thought.

Second, just as much evil has been perpetrated in the name of atheism or science as religion. Thus we have yet another reason the whole premise of the debate is flawed. We might as well debate whether or not the world would be better off without economics. Some economic policy is bad and some is good. But we can’t live without some kind of economic policy; else we would eventually all starve to death.

Third, the debate is part of the push the-world-would-be-better-off-without-religion-crowd will increasingly make toward ridding the world of religion. Governmental ban of religion is not a far-fetched notion; they would like nothing better. By way of reminder though, if that were to happen, the world would not be rid of religion, just all but the religion in power.

Fourth, the church has to be ever diligent to make a distinction between biblical Christianity and religion in general. Much evil has been perpetrated in the name of religion and indeed in the name of Christ. The fact that evil has been advanced in the name of Christ does not mean that there is a flaw in Christ or His Word. Rather, the flaw lies with us. That’s why it is so critical that we understand how God wants us to interact with the world and do so in faithfulness to His revealed will and not our own opinions or desires.

Or course, the world would be better off without all false ideas and false belief systems whether in the form of organized religion or atheism. Truth is what we need. There is no real understanding, meaning in life, and hope beyond the grave apart from the truth – which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. 

Dr. Paul Dean invites you to discover more about the role of government, the role of the church, and the role of the market  ... and develop a Christian worldview. Dr. Dean is a pastor, cultural commentator, and author. Please visit http://www.governmentcurrentevents.com

Follow us on Facebook

Recommend this article to your friends.

Comments

With the politicization of the homosexual agenda there is the oft repeated assertion that there is a genetic link to homosexuality. The thought is that if people believe that homosexuality is genetically determined then they will be more favorable to changing not only laws but even religious teaching concerning homosexuality. What is most concerning about that tactic is that some Christians have softened their teaching on the sinfulness of homosexuality. In other words, it’s working. Beyond that, there are “persons in the pews” and even conservative pastors who seem concerned about genetic links, real or imagined, and who further seem confused as to a biblical response. How then should Christians think about this issue?

First, according to leading epidemiologists, when they isolate a breast cancer gene for example, that gene does not guarantee breast cancer. It simply means that an individual is at greater risk for breast cancer statistically. In other words, more people with a particular gene or gene mutation got breast cancer than persons without that particular gene or gene mutation. But there are other factors that play into whether or not one will get breast cancer including environment, lifestyle choices, and more.

When it comes to homosexuality, these same epidemiologists put that issue in the category of behavior; and there are many factors involved in determining one's behavior including environment, moral values, and perhaps genetics. But one cannot isolate a gay gene in the same way one can isolate a breast cancer gene. Again, the experts tell us that while genetic factors, among others, may be involved in homosexuality, there is no such thing as a gay gene.

Second, Christians should not be alarmed that there may be genetic factors connected to homosexual desire. On the contrary, based upon the teaching of Scripture, we should expect that to be the case. Don’t misunderstand: homosexuality is sin. But think for a moment; human beings are totally depraved. Total Depravity does not mean that human beings are as sinful as they could be. Rather, it means that human beings have been affected by sin in every aspect of their being, including their genetic makeup. The Psalmist affirms, “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin my mother conceived me” (51:5). And again, “The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they are born, speaking lies” (58:3). Paul says that we are born dead in trespasses and sin (Eph. 2:1-3) and that we inherit a sinful nature from our parents (Rom. 5:12-21; 1 Cor. 15:21-22). If we inherit a sinful nature from our parents, then genetics are involved.

Think further: some people are inclined more than others to lie; some to steal; some to anger; some to drunkenness; and so forth. Some have an inclination to heterosexual promiscuity while some will struggle with homosexual desire. If the epidemiologists ultimately conclude that some may be predisposed to homosexuality, remember that genetics is not the only factor involved in what is a behavioral choice. Biology does not determine destiny. But also realize that we Christians should in no way be surprised or alarmed if genetics is a factor.

Third, the real issue has to do with what God says is right or wrong. Just because someone likes the taste of beer more than someone else doesn’t mean he gets a pass on being a drunkard. That’s sin. Just because someone may be more of a risk taker than someone who would play it safe every time doesn’t mean he gets a pass on gambling his family’s provision away. That’s sin. And just because someone may have a homosexual desire doesn’t mean he gets a pass on acting out on that desire. That’s sin.

The Bible is very clear on two things when it comes to homosexuality. The first thing is that it is sin and must be forsaken. Paul himself is incredulous that “persons in the pews” and conservative pastors would be confused. He asks, “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9-10). The second thing is that God gives grace and power to overcome homosexuality just like He gives grace and power to overcome other sins. After telling the Corinthians that the unrighteous, including homosexuals, will not inherit the kingdom of God, Paul told them, “And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor. 6:11). We have the responsibility to turn from our sinfulness and the million different ways that sinfulness manifests itself in our lives; and through the power of the gospel and the new birth we have the ability to do so.

We need not be concerned or confused; we have the answers to these things in the Scriptures. Let the Scriptures be our authority for faith and practice and we’ll never go wrong.

For a more extensive treatment of genetics and a biblical worldview, see my article here. For an analysis of genetics and ethical issues see my article here.

Dr. Paul Dean invites you to discover more about the role of government, the role of the church, and the role of the market  ... and develop a Christian worldview. Dr. Dean is a pastor, cultural commentator, and author. Please visit http://www.governmentcurrentevents.com

About Paul Dean

Dr. Paul Dean is a pastor, cultural commentator, and author. He serves as a Regional Mentor with the International Association of Biblical Counselors, speaks at several conferences throughout the year, and provides training for ministers and churches on a regular basis. Paul resides in the Upstate of South Carolina with his wife and three children. Please visit www.trueworldview.com for current resources and offerings.

GO
Example: "Gen 1:1" "John 3" "Moses" "trust"
Like Crosswalk?
Click Like to share
with your friends!
advertise with us

Free Email Newsletters

  • Crosswalk Weblog Weekly
  • BreakPoint
  • Crosswalk Films and Faith
More newsletters

Sign up for FREE Crosswalk.com Email Newsletters to receive email newsletters, updates and special offers from Crosswalk.com.

Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Shopping

RSS

Add Crosswalk.com content to your site

Browse available content