Bristol
Palin, the 18-year-old daughter of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, made
headlines last summer when it was revealed that she was about to become
an unwed mother. On December 27, she gave birth to a baby boy named
Tripp. Now, Bristol Palin is back in the news again -- and this time
by her own choice. She granted an interview to Fox News Channel's "On
the Record."
At the same time the pregnancy was made public last summer,
Bristol's mom had just been announced as Sen. John McCain's choice to
be his running mate. This put the pregnant teenager into the glare of
national publicity. Many were impressed and thankful as Bristol Palin
and Levi Johnson, her fiance' and the baby's father, made a commitment
not to have an abortion but to welcome the baby. They lived up to that
pledge, and baby Tripp seems to be doing quite well.
Bristol's parents also affirmed the sanctity of human life when they
made a similar commitment during Gov. Palin's pregnancy with a child
with Down syndrome. The vast majority of unborn babies identified as
carrying the marker for Down syndrome are now aborted, but the Palins
said they never even considered aborting their baby. Little Trig Palin,
soon to be a year old, was seen by millions of Americans during the
course of the campaign. That one baby became a testimony to the worth
of every single human life.
Bristol Palin is back in the headlines, and some Americans may be
shocked. Bristol told Fox News that teenagers should not have sex.
However, she also said that sexual abstinence for teens is "not
realistic at all."
These comments seem contradictory, but the national media
immediately leapt upon Bristol's apparent rejection of sexual
abstinence as an expectation for teenagers. To her credit, she
maintained a clear pro-life perspective, even as she admitted the
difficulty of being a teenage mother. But the rejection of sexual
abstinence as "not realistic at all" caught many off guard.
As reported in the press, Bristol's statement lacked context. But,
many in the media simply reduced the story to her statement about
abstinence. Consider this headline from the Associated Press: "Palin's Daughter Says Abstinence 'Not Realistic.'"
Many people who admired the way that the Palin family handled their
family crisis last summer will be rightly disappointed with this new
word from Bristol. But, leaving Bristol's personal situation aside for
now, her comment deserves a closer look.
Is sexual abstinence realistic for teenagers and young adults?
Well, abstinence is certainly not realistic when teenagers put
themselves or are put into a situation where sexual activity is
likely. At some point, sexual abstinence becomes very unrealistic
indeed.
The real issue for Christian teenagers and their parents is not to
debate whether sexual abstinence before marriage is realistic or not.
The larger and more important issue is that sexual abstinence until
marriage is the biblical expectation and command. Once this is
realized, the responsibility of all concerned is to ensure that
expectations and structures are in place so that abstinence is realistic.
The debate over whether abstinence is realistic or not misses the more important issue -- abstinence must be made realistic.
Parents and teenagers must make certain that adequate protections
and expectations are in place so that sexual abstinence is very
realistic indeed. Far too many Christian parents allow their teenagers
to be part of the "hooking up" scene of teenage culture. In that
highly sexualized context, sexual abstinence would appear unrealistic
in the extreme.
Premature pair dating and unsupervised liaisons, set within the
supercharged culture of teenage sexuality, can put teenagers into very
vulnerable situations. Asking whether sexual abstinence in those
contexts is realistic can appear almost irrational.
Those who reject the norm of sexual abstinence for teenagers will
leap on Bristol Palin's statement as evidence for their cause. But the
real issue here is our responsibility to ensure that abstinence is made
realistic and stays realistic. Anything short of this is truly "not realistic at all."