The NEW Bible Study Tools are here - Explore them now!
E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
HOME

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search

Supreme Court Dismisses 'Under God' Pledge Suit

Mat Staver

Liberty Counsel

June 14, 2004

The Supreme Court today preserved the phrase “one nation, under God,” in the Pledge of Allegiance, ruling that Michael Newdow, a California atheist, could not challenge the patriotic oath. The legal effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling is to overturn the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision two years ago that struck the words “Under God” from the pledge. 

 

The Supreme Court decision held that Michael Newdow lacked standing to bring his case because he did not have the legal authority to speak on behalf of his daughter. 


Newdow is currently involved in a custody battle with his ex-wife. Justices Rehnquist, Thomas and O’Connor issued a concurring opinion agreeing that Newdow lacked standing, but also arguing that the phrase “Under God” in the pledge is constitutional.

 

After today’s ruling, it is as if Mr. Newdow had never brought his case in the courts. Prior to today’s ruling by the Supreme Court, schoolchildren in states covered by the Ninth Circuit (Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington) were barred from saying the pledge of allegiance with the inclusion of the phrase “Under God.” Now, there is no prohibition against saying the entire pledge in those states.

 

Liberty Counsel, a nationwide civil liberties legal defense and education organization headquartered in Orlando, Florida, filed an Amicus Brief at the United States Supreme Court in the case.

 

Mathew Staver, President and General Counsel of Liberty Counsel, stated, “We are pleased that the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision is to uphold the constitutionality of the pledge of allegiance. Schoolchildren in states covered by the Ninth Circuit can now say the entire pledge of allegiance without fear of censorship.” Staver continued, “Justices Rehnquist, Thomas and O’Connor are correct that the pledge of allegiance is constitutional. Our history is not complete without God.  If “under God” were removed, many history books and founding documents will be in jeopardy, not the least of which is the Declaration of Independence.”

 

For More on This Story:

MSNBC: Court dismisses pledge suit
CNN: Court dismisses Pledge case

 

 

 

 

Most Recent User Comments
Be the first to comment on this article!
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!