Declare Your Faith - Sign the "I Am a Christian" Pledge
E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
COMMENTARY Sponsorship

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search

The Latest Problems with the "Man Evolved From Apes" Thesis

Frank Pastore

"The Frank Pastore Show," KKLA, Los Angeles


August 31, 2007

Cavemen are popular once again.

No, I'm not talking about those successful Geico commercials that won their own series on ABC starting October 2.

I'm talking about the two discoveries that came out in August that should force all those "man evolved from apes" evolution charts in schoolbooks to be redrawn. You know the ones. You've got the knuckle-dragging, club-wielding ape on the left hand side and a businessman carrying a briefcase on the right hand side, with all the hypothetical evolutionary links filled in between (as in this one).

What's been discovered is a 10.5 million year old gorilla and that two of our "ape men" ancestors actually lived together.

Let me explain.

See, the problem is-these two discoveries render all previous human evolution charts wrong.

But, the bigger problem is-unless you're a scientist-you've likely never have heard about it outside of this column or at least until you'd see the trailer for Ben Stein's movie "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" coming out in February 2008.

As Stein exposes, there's been a virtual Inquisition by Darwinian fundamentalists against anyone who dares challenge The Book-Darwin's infamous 1859 "Origin of the Species." No longer about following the bread crumbs of inquiry in pursuit of truth, Big Science is now all about enforcing doctrinaire dogmatism.

Dare question the problems with naturalistic evolution, as I do here, and be guilty of blasphemy.

Ask for explanations about the still missing "missing links," the absence of transitional forms, the sudden Cambrian Explosion, or the gaping gaps in the fossil record, and be branded an unbeliever-one who must repent of their sins, recant and do penance or be damned to academic hell for all time.

As I learned long ago, if you can believe the first sentence of the Bible, "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth," you won't have much trouble with the rest of the 66 books.

Make no mistake. Fundamentalists are those who censure skeptics and prohibit inquiry. Today's fundamentalists are not the Christians who, like me, are eager to examine the scientific evidence for Darwinian evolution, but those who deny that opportunity from ever happening.

The real fundamentalists are those who chair the various science departments at our major universities-those unwilling to allow dissent.

Nonetheless, they're losing. Their program to indoctrinate students into scientism is failing.

According to a recent USA Today/Gallup Poll , 66 percent of Americans believe man is the product of creation, not evolution.

"Evolution" is a term that can be so broad so as to mean simply "change through time," which no one disputes. Or, it can be so narrowly construed so as to mean "all life originated from a single living cell," and "man evolved from apes," which Americans reject by a margin of two to one.

No. We are no closer today proving those last two theses than we were in Darwin's day, a century and a half ago. In fact, we're actually farther away.

So, what were these two important recent discoveries?

First, as reported on August 9, two alleged ancestors of man, Homo Erectus and Homo Habilis, were found to be living together about 1.5 million years ago (MYA). This is a big deal because Erectus was supposed to have evolved from Habilis before later evolving into Sapiens (us).

Think of it as finding out dad and grandpa were actually brothers, not father and son.

This chart on Early Human Phylogeny at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, will have to be revised-again. The mythical evolutionary tree of life with man's ascent from ape is looking more like a patch of thousands of blades of grass with the passing of each generation. Sapiens ends up all by himself-an evolutionary orphan-almost as though he just appeared in the fossil record fully formed-as though he were created and placed here. Imagine that.

The second discovery, reported here, pushed the hypothetical human-ape split back another 10 million years, to now around 20 MYA. How so? The traditional theory is that man evolved from chimps about 6 MYA, chimps evolved from gorillas about 8 MYA, and gorillas evolved from orangutans about 14 MYA. But, with the discovery of a 10.5 million year old gorilla in Africa, this pushes the human-ape split back to at least 20 MYA.

But between 15-20 MYA, there were dozens of primate species in Africa, and the hominid trail goes completely cold after 7 MYA. It looks like a dead end-or to the true believer, at least a serious detour over uncharted territory.

Bottom line, not only do we find that dad and grandpa were brothers, but now we find out that we were adopted-or created.

As the authors of the report on all this in the British journal Nature noted, "We know nothing about how the human line actually emerged from apes."


Frank Pastore is host of "The Frank Pastore Show," recognized by the National Religious Broadcasters as Talk Show Host of the Year in 2006. His program is heard on KKLA in Los Angeles 4-7 p.m. Monday through Friday. Contact Frank at Frank@kkla.com.

 

 

Most Recent User Comments
afarensis
9/12/2007 4:33 AM
"But, the bigger problem is-unless you're a scientist-you've likely never have heard about it outside of this column"

Actually, they are a quick google search away. And as you can see, they are on "evolution" sources.

10.5 MYO "Gorilla"

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070824121653.65mgd37f&show_article=1
http://www.physorg.com/news107011927.html
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/317/5841/1016a
http://genomicron.blogspot.com/2007/08/press-going-ape-again.html
http://scitizen.com/screens/blogPage/viewBlog/sw_viewBlog.php?idTheme=27&idC..972
http://www.biotechnews.com.au/index.php/id;1353041073

Habilis/erectus chronological overlap

http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/dept/d10/asb/anthro2003/origins/hominid_journey/timeline.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/species.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/08/africa/evolve.php
http://www.ecotao.com/holism/hu_habilis.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_erectus


afarensis
9/12/2007 1:26 AM
"The traditional theory is that man evolved from chimps about 6 MYA... gorillas evolved from orangutans about 14 MYA.”

This is not only a mischaracterization of Evolution, it is completely untrue. These apes share common ancestry—they didn’t “evolve from” one another. Based on this faulty premise, the author then proceeds with some puzzling logic.

This new finding at best pushes the gorilla/non-gorilla split further back by about 2-4 MY. It doesn’t necessarily change the Chimpanzee-Human split, as this wouldn’t happen until AFTER. The author is misusing the notion of a “human-ape split,” and the reader is left to assume that this means the split between humans and chimpanzees. What this is in fact referring to is the first ape-human split (meaning the point when Orangutans would split off of the line that leads to humans, at this point, this still includes the line that will lead to gorillas and chimpanzees).
afarensis
9/12/2007 1:21 AM
It may be possible that they too simply share a common ancestor. There may be more hominid fossils not yet found. Perhaps more and more “Habilis” fossils will be found to the point where Habilis itself is split into subgroups the way Erectus has been. We may find that Habilis goes further back, to 3MYA at which point we don’t really call it Habilis but something else (similar to the overlap Ergaster and early Erectus). As time moves forward, Anthropologists will uncover more hominids and existing lines become split into smaller taxons, and we may find completely new hominids that do an even better job of filling these gaps. Whatever the case may be, Habilis, with its cranial capacity from 550cc-800cc (depending on which specimens we refer to) shows up in the fossil record almost 1 million years before early Erectus, with its 900cc (1100cc for later Erectus fossils) and more advanced tools.
http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/dept/d10/asb/anthro2003/origins/hominid_journey/timeline.html
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!