Declare Your Faith - Sign the "I Am a Christian" Pledge
E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
COMMENTARY Sponsorship

AVERAGE USER RATING

RATE THIS ARTICLE

  • Email
  • Print
  • Discuss
Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
Islam: The Religion and the People

Islam: The Religion and the People...Continued from page 1

Robert Wayne

Contributing Writer

To understand Islam, Lewis notes, the popular dichotomy of religion and government has to be rejected.

Lewis differentiates between Christianity and Christendom, explaining the latter as the part of the world in which Christianity prevails. It can be separated because Christianity and culture can be split into distinct categories, such as separation of church and state.

Islam, however, cannot be separated into state and church, Lewis explains. There is no Islamdom per se, because everything comes under submission to the Koran, the holy book of Islam. He writes,

“In Christendom, God and emperor, state and church, were distinct – sometimes in harmony, sometimes in conflict, sometimes joined, sometimes separate, sometimes one dominant, sometimes the other, but always two. In Islam, the prophet [Muhammad] who brought the holy book and founded the faith also founded and headed the first Muslim state, and both promulgated and enforced the one all-embracing holy law. There is therefore an interpretation of religion and politics, affecting government and law, identity and loyalty, to a degree without parallel in Judeo-Christian history.”

The Third Conquest

The West, meanwhile, is increasingly shaped by Islam, Lewis said.

“Look at Europe; Muslims are now on their third attempt to take over Europe,” he said. “First was medieval times ... the second was the Ottoman Turks conquering of Constantinople and advancing as far as Vienna, so this is the third time. Only this time the conquest is by migration, increasing numbers settling in Europe, by demography (i.e. population increase based on increasing number of Muslim children being born) and now by conversion.”

Islam’s success so far may hinge on its “purity,” meaning that the fundamentals of the faith are being followed fairly closely to what Muhammad dictated.

“Christianity has gone through the process of secularization; Islam has not,” Lewis said. “Islam is now in its early 15th century and a lot of processes that Christendom has gone through Islam has not gone through.”

Will it ever? Not if the most radically fundamentalist of Muslims have their way. In their minds, the greatest events are yet to come.

The End Times

Lewis paints a scary scenario of the impending Islamic end times, similar to the Christian apocalypse, as two trends gain prominence. First, Islamic militants like Osama bin Laden preach that Islam is in the final days of its jihad (holy war) against the infidels, which includes Christians and anyone else not proclaiming Islam as the only religion of truth.

“In this final phase, the world of the infidels was divided between the Soviet Union and the United States,” Lewis said. “After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Osama said, ‘We have destroyed the more dangerous of the two.’ He is saying that the next one, the U.S., will be easy.”

The second worrisome aspect of Islamic fundamentalism began in the 1980s as Iran gained power through revolution.

“It now looks to me like the Iranian Revolution is entering the Stalin or Napoleonic stage of ruthless dictatorship,” Lewis said.

Combine the fundamentalist thought and actions of bin Laden and Iran with the teachings on Islamic end times and you have a dangerous mix.

“There will be a struggle between good and evil and an anti-Christ type character will appear on the earth,” Lewis said. “Ahmadinejad, who is head of Iran, believes that time is now. From their point of view, the war has broken out and now they have to win it.”

He continued, “During the cold war both the United States and Soviet Union had weapons of mass destruction, which led to MAD (mutual assured destruction). Each knew if they used them then the other would, too. MAD was a deterrent with the Soviets.”

Not the case with radical Muslims.

“With these people it’s not a deterrent but an inducement,” Lewis said. “They believe there will be the final struggle, which they want. So [nuclear war] is more like exaltation.”

The final threat?

“I suppose it’s that Islam is taken over by radicals and that radical Islam takes over the West,” Lewis said. “They destroy each other and everything else gets contested by the Indians or the Chinese.”

 

Related Links
Previous | 1 | 2 | All
Most Recent User Comments
Be the first to comment on this article!
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Crosswalk.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the opportunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!