What Christians Must Know about AI Persuasion
In a scene from the PBS animated series Arthur, Buster the rabbit asks in shock, “You really think someone would do that? Just go on the internet and tell lies?” Obviously, Buster was a little naive. In the 20 years since, the internet has proven to be a bottomless source of confusion, propaganda, and misinformation.
Until recently, online lies have come from actual people. This is no longer the case. A team of researchers at the University of Zurich recently performed a highly questionable experiment with AI bots impersonating people. Apparently, they were very effective at changing the beliefs of people on Reddit.
In their paper, entitled “Can AI Change Your View? Evidence from a Large-Scale Online Field Experiment,” these researchers detailed how they tasked AI bots to study user profiles without their knowledge in order to find vulnerabilities. The bots then posed as real people in chat forums and tried to persuade human users of left-leaning beliefs. It worked frighteningly well.
The researchers estimated that the AI bots, some of which pretended to be rape victims, LGBTQ, or government employees, achieved a persuasion rate six times that of human users. On topics ranging from abortion to whether Christianity is good for the world, the bots deployed arguments fine-tuned to exploit vulnerabilities, often using lies, misinformation, or highly debatable claims. And again, it worked. After conversing with the undercover bots, people changed their minds.
As tech entrepreneur Mario Nawfal put it, this experiment “should chill anyone who values authentic human discourse.” These “digital ghosts” crossed “critical ethical lines,” fabricating over 1,500 comments, “each precisely calibrated to exploit cognitive vulnerabilities of their human targets.” Also, this was done without the knowledge or consent of those targeted, whose views, for all we know, could remain permanently altered by these fake and dishonest exchanges.
The experiment has been roundly condemned by Reddit forum moderators, and rightly so. Still, as Nawfal pointed out, it raises a frightening and much bigger question: “How many other digital conversations are currently being shaped by invisible algorithmic hands?” Is the person you’re arguing with online right now a person?
In many ways, the challenge of lying robots on the internet parallels other emerging challenges, like the possibility of brainless “spare bodies” for organ harvesting, or polygenic embryo screening that allows parents to choose “perfect” babies. The dizzying possibilities of our age expose how far our technology has outrun our ethics—how our ability to do things has overwhelmed our ability to think about whether we should do those things. As with various biotechnologies, artificial intelligence has raised questions our society is not prepared to answer. Sadly, for the most part, neither is the Church.
Less than ten years ago, the press went frantic over Russian efforts to influence the outcome of the 2016 election using memes. How much more should we be concerned about a future of AI chatbots that can study our beliefs, identify our blind spots and change our minds? In the age of AI, it is even more essential that we hone discernment, a skill mentioned a lot in the New Testament.
For example, in Philippians 1, Paul prayed that the church’s love would abound in “knowledge and all discernment, so that (they) may approve what is excellent, and so be pure and blameless for the day of Christ.” In Colossians 2, Paul warned his readers to not be deluded by “plausible arguments.” Further, he instructed:
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.
How much more should Christians have a strong mooring in the Person who is Truth and a sharp nose for deception in an age where deception is automated? Of course, AI doesn’t believe anything, nor could it. The fact that it can be instructed to lie, and be so good at it, only proves how deceptive humans are.
The need of the hour is the type of discernment that Paul urged. From the beginning, this has been the primary mission of Breakpoint, to cultivate discernment so that God’s people can live faithfully and courageously in a confused culture. And from the beginning, God has used friends and donors like you to keep Breakpoint free and available.
June 30 is the final day of our fiscal year. Please consider financially supporting the Colson Center so that Breakpoint can continue to cultivate the kind of discernment necessary for the Church to BE the Church in this cultural moment. Give a one-time gift or become a Colson Center Cornerstone monthly partner at colsoncenter.org/May.
Photo Credit: ©iStock/Getty Images Plus/Laurence Dutton
Published Date: May 22, 2025
John Stonestreet is President of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, and radio host of BreakPoint, a daily national radio program providing thought-provoking commentaries on current events and life issues from a biblical worldview. John holds degrees from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (IL) and Bryan College (TN), and is the co-author of Making Sense of Your World: A Biblical Worldview.
The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of CrosswalkHeadlines.
BreakPoint is a program of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. BreakPoint commentaries offer incisive content people can't find anywhere else; content that cuts through the fog of relativism and the news cycle with truth and compassion. Founded by Chuck Colson (1931 – 2012) in 1991 as a daily radio broadcast, BreakPoint provides a Christian perspective on today's news and trends. Today, you can get it in written and a variety of audio formats: on the web, the radio, or your favorite podcast app on the go.
