Texas Woman’s Wrongful-Death Suit Claims Man Spiked Her Tea with Abortion Pill
A Texas woman claims in a new wrongful-death lawsuit that a romantic partner secretly spiked her drink with an abortion pill, ending a pregnancy with a baby she was eager and excited to raise. The plaintiff of Corpus Christi, Texas, alleges in the lawsuit that she became pregnant during a relationship with her next-door neighbor, Christopher Cooprider, who quickly began urging -- and later demanding -- that she have an abortion to “get rid of it,” according to a text listed in the suit. Cooprider is a Marine pilot in training, the suit says.
The plaintiff, however, stood firm in rejecting an abortion, texting him, “I can’t wait to hold that gorgeous baby,” and “babies aren’t mistakes,” the lawsuit states.
Eventually, when Cooprider realized the woman would not take the abortion pill regimen he had ordered through the mail, he secretly slipped the medication into her drink, the lawsuit says. That night, she began hemorrhaging.
“Christopher Cooprider murdered [the plaintiff's] unborn child by secretly dissolving abortion pills into a hot beverage that he had prepared and tricking [her] into drinking it,” the suit says. “Cooprider obtained these drugs from Aid Access, a criminal organization that illegally ships abortion pills into Texas and other jurisdictions where abortion has been outlawed.”
The plaintiff is seeking damages, alleging his actions violated multiple Texas laws, including informed-consent requirements, the state’s ban on abortion pills, and wrongful-death statutes.
Even before she took a pregnancy test, Cooprider was urging her to have an abortion, according to the lawsuit.
“I would like to get rid of it if the test is positive,” he allegedly said in a text.
“So you’re one of those ‘conservative till it happens to my mistress’ guys,” she texted back.
He allegedly texted, “We are not in love. We are not together.”
Although the plaintiff said she had no interest in an abortion, Cooprider ordered an abortion pill regimen from Aid Access, a company that mails abortion-inducing drugs. The company is named in the suit.
When Cooprider encouraged her to take the pills, she texted him, “This little person did nothing to harm you, they are not dangerous, they are not some infectious agent that you have to stay far away from.”
Cooprider allegedly later texted her, “If that thing ever gets born, it would be a failure on multiple levels.”
Approximately two months after the plaintiff tested positive- and after multiple back-and-forths in which he was unable to persuade her—he allegedly offered to get together for a “trust-building night” where he would “make us some warm, relaxing tea.” She agreed to the proposal, believing they could repair the damage in their relationship.
“[The plaintiff] thought that the proposed ‘trust building night’ could salvage something from a bad situation and increase the likelihood that her soon-to-be-born daughter would have at least some semblance of a relationship with her biological father,” the suit says.
That night, April 5, 2025, Cooprider allegedly slipped the first step in the abortion regimen into her hot chocolate as she was tending to her dog.
“Shortly before midnight, and within 30 minutes of consuming the tainted drink, [the plaintiff] began hemorrhaging and cramping,” the lawsuit says.
Cooprider allegedly promised to help by picking up her mother, who was disabled and unable to drive. The plan was for him to watch the plaintiff's children while he drove her to the emergency room. He left the apartment to get her mother but never came back, the suit says, and he never picked up Davis’ mother.
“By now [the plaintiff] realized that Cooprider had poisoned her (and her baby) with the abortion pills that he had bought, and that he had abandoned her and lied to delay her from obtaining medical care that might save her unborn daughter,” the suit says.
Another neighbor took her to the hospital, but doctors were unable to save her baby.
“The wrongful-death statute allows surviving parents to sue those who cause the death of an unborn child by a wrongful act, neglect, carelessness, unskillfulness, or default,” the suit says. “Each of the defendants caused the death of [the plaintiff's] unborn child through their wrongful acts.”
Photo Credit: ©GettyImages/WiroKlyngz
Michael Foust has covered the intersection of faith and news for 20 years. His stories have appeared in Baptist Press, Christianity Today, The Christian Post, the Leaf-Chronicle, the Toronto Star and the Knoxville News-Sentinel.
Listen to Michael's Podcast! He is the host of Crosswalk Talk, a podcast where he talks with Christian movie stars, musicians, directors, and more. Hear how famous Christian figures keep their faith a priority in Hollywood and discover the best Christian movies, books, television, and other entertainment. You can find Crosswalk Talk on LifeAudio.com, or subscribe on Apple or Spotify so you never miss an interview that will be sure to encourage your faith.
Originally published August 13, 2025.
