aims to offer the most compelling biblically-based content to Christians on their walk with Jesus. is your online destination for all areas of Christian Living – faith, family, fun, and community. Each category is further divided into areas important to you and your Christian faith including Bible study, daily devotions, marriage, parenting, movie reviews, music, news, and more.

Religion Today Blog Christian Blog and Commentary

FREE ebook: Getting Through the Storms of Life

Amanda Casanova

Amanda Casanova is a writer living in Dallas, Texas. She has covered news for since 2014. She has also contributed to The Houston Chronicle, U.S. News and World Report and She blogs at The Migraine Runner.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo responded to sexual assault allegations against him, saying he was “being playful” with female colleagues and he is “truly sorry” for his actions.

"Questions have been raised about some of my past interactions with people in the office," Cuomo said in a press release on Sunday. "I never intended to offend anyone or cause any harm. I spend most of my life at work and colleagues are often also personal friends."

"At work sometimes I think I am being playful and make jokes that I think are funny. I do, on occasion, tease people in what I think is a good-natured way," the governor said. "I do it in public and in private. You have seen me do it at briefings hundreds of times. I have teased people about their personal lives, their relationships, about getting married or not getting married. I mean no offense and only attempt to add some levity and banter to what is a very serious business."

Cuomo’s apology came days after his former aide Lindsey Boylan published a story alleging that Boylan forcibly kissed her once and sexually harassed her while she worked for him.

Also last week, a second former aide came forward to accuse Cuomo of sexual harassment. Charlotte Bennett, a former executive assistant and health policy adviser for Cuomo, claimed Cuomo asked her questions about her sex life and told her that he was open to relationships with women in their 20s. Bennett is 25.

In his statement, Cuomo said he is asking for an independent review into the allegations.

"I now understand that my interactions may have been insensitive or too personal and that some of my comments, given my position, made others feel in ways I never intended. I acknowledge some of the things I have said have been misinterpreted as an unwanted flirtation. To the extent anyone felt that way, I am truly sorry about that."

Photo courtesy: ©Getty Images/Spencer Platt/Staff

Amanda Casanova is a writer living in Dallas, Texas. She has covered news for since 2014. She has also contributed to The Houston Chronicle, U.S. News and World Report and She blogs at The Migraine Runner.

A school district in Virginia will not celebrate Read Across America Day, the March 2 day that recognizes Dr. Seuss, after an educators group said the books contain “racial undertones.”

According to CBN News, Read Across America Day also celebrates the birthday of Dr. Seuss, whose books have largely inspired generations to value reading and writing.

Loudon County Public Schools in Virginia recently announced that schools would not participate in Read Across America Day and would not be read the Dr. Seuss books.

"Realizing that many schools continue to celebrate 'Read Across America Day' in partial recognition of Dr. Seuss' birthday, it is important for us to be cognizant of research that may challenge our practice in this regard," an announcement reads.

"As we become more culturally responsive and racially conscious, all building leaders should know that in recent years there has been research revealing racial undertones in the books written and the illustrations drawn by Dr. Seuss."

The announcement came after Learning for Justice, a left-wing educators group, asked schools to cancel the annual Dr. Seuss event, The Daily Wire reports.

In a magazine article, “It’s Time to Talk about Dr. Seuss,” the Southern Poverty Law Center group Learning for Justice pointed to a study that claimed Dr. Seuss books promote “orientalism, anti-blackness and white supremacy.”

In the study of 50 Dr. Seuss books, researchers said they believed there is little diversity in the books.

“Of the 2,240 (identified) human characters, there are 45 of color representing two percent of the total number of human characters,” the study from St. Catherine University reads. Of the 45 characters of color, 43 “exhibited behaviors and appearances that align with harmful and stereotypical Orientalist tropes.”

Many of the Dr. Seuss books were written in the 1950s.

“It’s also important to note that each of the non-white characters is male and that they are all ‘presented in subservient, exotified, or dehumanized roles,’ especially in relation to white characters,” Learning for Justice said in its article.

This year’s Read Across America Day theme is “Create and Celebrate Diversity.” The March 2 celebration was founded by the National Education Association in 1998.

Photo courtesy: Scott Webb/Unsplash

Amanda Casanova is a writer living in Dallas, Texas. She has covered news for since 2014. She has also contributed to The Houston Chronicle, U.S. News and World Report and She blogs at The Migraine Runner.

(RNS) — On Thursday (Feb. 25), the Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed a sweeping LGBTQ rights bill called the Equality Act.

Republicans for the most part objected, with some of them now advocating for a rival bill called Fairness for All, introduced by Rep. Chris Stewart of Utah on Friday with 20 Republican co-sponsors.

Both bills would ban discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. But Fairness for All would also carve out exemptions for faith-based organizations, which played a big role in drafting it.

The Equality Act in its current form probably has no chance in the Senate, given it will need 10 Senate Republican votes in order to beat back a GOP filibuster.

The Fairness for All bill probably has no chance in the House, given the Democratic majority there.

But there could be a way forward if the Senate combines provisions of both bills. Such a compromise may win the signature of President Biden who said LGBTQ protections are one of his top legislative priorities for the first 100 days of his presidency.

Here are some of the issues at stake.

What is the Equality Act?

Basically, it would add sexual orientation and gender identity to the list of personal characteristics protected by federal civil rights law.

Twenty-nine states have no protections for LGBTQ people. That means people can be fired from their jobs for being LGBTQ, and landlords can refuse to rent or sell to them. They can also be denied services in a restaurant or bakery.

The Equality Act would not only ban discrimination but also deny federal funding to groups that discriminate against LGBTQ people. It would accomplish that by expanding the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which already bans discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin.

The bill would also expand the types of public spaces that would not be able to discriminate against LGBTQ people to include shopping malls, sports arenas and online retailers. Right now, nondiscrimination rules cover mostly restaurants, amusement parks and hotels.

Who opposes it?

The bill is strongly opposed by many religious groups on multiple fronts. They say houses of worship, like churches and synagogues, must be explicitly excluded from the public accommodations list, otherwise religious groups that oppose same-sex marriage might be forced to offer their fellowship halls to LGBTQ wedding ceremonies, for example.

Many groups are offering dire predictions of what might happen if The Equality Act becomes law. They say it would halt free and reduced-cost lunch programs for children who attend religious schools and threaten federal security grants for Orthodox Jewish synagogues because they oppose same-sex marriage.

Students at religious colleges that view marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman would no longer be eligible for federal student loans and grants. (About 70% of students at schools affiliated with the Council of Christian Colleges and Universities receive Pell grants and federal research grants.) The schools themselves may no longer be able to screen faculty hires for those who agree with the school’s views on marriage and human sexuality.

The bill would also limit people’s ability to defend themselves against discrimination claims by overriding the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the 1993 law that protects the religious exercise of individuals and institutions. That means a bakery would no longer be able to deny its wedding cake services to a same-sex couple by using the RFRA defense, for example.

Some groups also worry it would blur gender lines in women’s sports, allowing transgender women to play in women’s leagues.

What’s the Fairness for All bill?

This bill would also provide broad protections for LGBTQ people while also protecting religious institutions that uphold traditional beliefs about marriage and sexuality.

It is modeled on the “Utah Compromise,” a 2015 state law that strengthened religious freedom and protected LGBTQ people from discrimination. Fairness for All has been championed by the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, the Seventh-day Adventist Church, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the National Association of Evangelicals, which hasn’t formally endorsed it but was consulted in its drafting.

“Our coalition has always had a problem-solving mindset,” said Shirley Hoogstra, CCCU president. “We believe LGBTQ people should be treated with equity and equality in the U.S. We have Supreme Court cases that have set that up. And we know religious organizations play an important role in society and that nobody should coerce the other.”

The bill would still face stiff headwinds from other religious groups that oppose the idea of adding sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. The Southern Baptist Convention and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, for example, will likely oppose Fairness for All or any bill extending LGBTQ protections.

So is a compromise possible?

Many centrists think so. Both bills have been introduced before and have failed. But there might be a way forward if the Senate is able to combine the major features of the Equality Act with the exemptions called for in the Fairness for All bill.

The Senate needs 10 Republican senators to pass a revised bill. Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rob Portman of Ohio and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have been supportive of LGBTQ+ rights before. Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah would likely be, too, especially since the Utah Compromise has been successful so far in that state.

There’s another reason, too. Champions of a compromise point out that Americans broadly support LGBTQ protections. More than 8 in 10 Americans favor laws that would protect LGBTQ people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations and housing, according to a 2020 PRRI American Values Survey.


Article originally published by Religion News Service. Used with permission.

Photo courtesy: Teddy Osterblom/Unsplash